Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 17432 (GAU)

Smti Sartam Yama and Anr v. Manish Kumar Gupta and 2 Ors

IA(C)/8/2026 · 2026-01-07

Susmita Phukan Khaund

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC040000272026 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : IA(C)/8/2026 Smti Sartam Yama and Anr Wife of Late Sartam Vijoy, resident of Horticulture Colony Chimpu, PO and PS Chimpu, Papum Pare District, Arunachal Pradesh. 2: Nyit Lomdak Age: Occupation : Shri Tania Lomdak resident of Horticulture Colony Chimpu Papum Pare District Arunachal Pradesh VERSUS Manish Kumar Gupta and 2 Ors the Chief Secretary, Govt of Arunachal Pradesh, Itanagar 2:Karyom Doji Age: 0 Occupation : Director of Horticulture Department Govt of Arunachal Pradesh Itanagar. 3:Tabom Bam Age: 0 Occupation : Director of Horticulture Department Govt of Arunachal Pradesh Advocate for the Petitioner : Orin Modi, Advocate for the Respondent : Tsering Gyatso, Page No.# 2/3 BEFORE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SUSMITA PHUKAN KHAUND ORDER Date : 08.01.2026 Heard Mr. O. Modi, learned counsel for the applicant. Also heard Mr. T. Gyatso, learned counsel for the respondents. An application has been filed with a prayer for impleading Shri Tabom Bam, who is presently serving as the Director of Horticulture, Government of Arunachal Pradesh. It is submitted that the earlier Director who was impleaded as respondent No. 2 has retired from service. After considering the submissions at the bar, the application with a prayer to implead Shri Tabom Bam as respondent No. 3 is allowed. In this regard, the learned counsel for the respondents raised no objection. An amended cause title may be filed in connected Contempt Case (C) No. 29(AP)/2025. Accordingly, the interlocutory application stands allowed. The present applicant, namely, Shri Tabom Bam, is impleaded as respondent No. 3, in the connected Contempt Case (C) No. 29(AP)/ 2025. Page No.# 3/3 The interlocutory application stands disposed of in terms of the above. JUDGE Comparing Assistant