Page No.# 1/3 GAHC040006962023 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : IA(C)/94/2023 Food Corporation of India Age: 0 Occupation : Address:Represented by The General Manager (Region) Food Corporation of India Assam Region G.S. Road Paltan Bazar Guwahati Assam. VERSUS M/s ERA PDS Nominee and Carriage Agency and 2 Ors. Age: 0 Occupation : Address:Roing PO Roing Dist. Lower Dibang Valley Arunachal Pradesh Represented by its Constituted Attorney Sri Sajjan Kumar Goyel S/o Late Maniram Goyel Resident of Bordoloi Nagar PO and PS Tinsukia Dist. Tinsukia Assam. 2:THE STATE OF AP Age: 0 Occupation : Address:Represented by The Chief Secretary to the Govt. of Arunachal Pradesh PO Itanagar Arunachal Pradesh. 3:the Secretary Page No.# 2/3 Age: 0 Occupation : Address:to the Govt. of Arunachal Pradesh Representing The Civil Supplies Department PO Itanagar Arunachal Pradesh. ------------ Advocate for : B K Singh Advocate for : GA (AP) appearing for M/s ERA PDS Nominee and Carriage Agency and 2 Ors.: Advocate , , appearing for 2, 3, respectively. BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BUDI HABUNG ORDER Date : 08.01.2026 Heard Mr. B. K. Singh, learned counsel for the applicant. Also heard Mr. Binter Picha, learned counsel for Opposite Party No. 1 and Ms. Pubi Pangu, learned Government Advocate, for Opposite Parties No. 2 & 3. This is an application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963, seeking condonation of delay of 52 days in preferring the connected review petition. The reasons for delay in not filing the connected review petition within the stipulated time, has been explained by the applicant in paragraphs No. 2 to 8 of this application. Upon hearing the learned counsels appearing for the parties and on perusal of the explanation given in the above-noted paragraphs; this Court is satisfied that the applicant was prevented by a sufficient cause in not preferring the connected review petition within the stipulated time. Moreover, the respondents have no objection condoning the delay, in question. Page No.# 3/3 In view of the above; the delay of 52 days in preferring the connected review petition is hereby condoned. The interlocutory application accordingly stands allowed and disposed of. As requested, list the connected review petition being Rev.P. 04(AP)2023 for admission after 4(four) weeks on a date to be fixed by the Registry. JUDGE Comparing Assistant