[2026:RJ-JP:757] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 376/2025 1. Smt. Vinita Sharma W/o Shri Ramswaroop Sharma, Aged About 74 Years, R/o D-703, Malviya Nagar, Jaipur. 2. Shri Ramswaroop Sharma S/o Shri Murari Lal Sharma, Aged About 82 Years, R/o D-703, Malviya Nagar, Jaipur. 3. Aniket Sharma S/o Shri Narendra Prasad Sharma, Aged About 37 Years, R/o A-52, Anand Vihar, Railway Colony, Jagatpura, Jaipur. ----Accused-Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ---Respondent 2. Balram Saini S/o Shri Babulal Saini, R/o Plot No. 3, Shiv Colony, Murlipura, Jaipur. (Raj.) ----Complainant/Non-petitioner 3. Mr. Vinod Shankla, SHO, Police Station Jawahar Circle, District Jaipur City (East) Now Transferred. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sushil Pujari, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Amit Punia, PP and Ms. Himanshi Bhatiya, Adv., on behalf of Ms. Srijana Shresth, Adv. for complainant. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 08/01/2026 1. The matter comes up on an application (I.A. No.1/2025) for deleting the name of accused-petitioner No.1 Smt. Vinita Sharma from the array of the petitioners as she had expired on 25.09.2025. [2026:RJ-JP:757] (2 of 3) [CRLW-376/2025] 2. For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed. Amended cause title filed with the application is hereby taken on record. 3. Another application (I.A. No.2/2025) has also been filed on behalf of the petitioners with the prayer that the present criminal writ petition to quash the FIR No.751/2024 registered at Police Station Jawahar Circle, District Jaipur City (East) for the offences punishable under Sections 447, 420, 384 and 120B of IPC alongwith criminal proceedings arising out of it, may be disposed of on the basis of compromise arrived at between the parties. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners have entered into a compromise with the complainant. He submits that the complainant does not want to pursue the impugned FIR. 5. Learned Public Prosecutor and learned counsel for the complainant do not dispute the aforesaid factual position. 6. Considering the submissions made on behalf of the respective parties; the material made available for my perusal and the fact that the parties have resolved their dispute amicably and the present case is wholly covered by the principle of law laid down by Hon'ble the Supreme Court in the case of Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab & Anr reported in 2012 Cr.L.J. (SC) 4934 and in the case of State of Haryana & Ors. Vs. Choudhary Bhajan Lal & Ors. reported in AIR 1992 SC 604, the aforesaid FIR is liable to be quashed in view of compromise arrived at between the parties. 7. In view of the above, this criminal misc. petition is allowed and the FIR No.751/2024 registered at Police Station Jawahar [2026:RJ-JP:757] (3 of 3) [CRLW-376/2025] Circle, District Jaipur City (East) alongwith criminal proceedings arising out of it are quashed and set aside. Consequence to follow. 8. The misc. application (I.A. No.2/2025) is allowed accordingly. 9. Stay application also stands disposed of. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J MADAN/S-371