Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 17428 (PNJ)

ANURAG VERMA v. RAJ KUMAR AND OTHERS

INCOMP/969/2026 · 2026-04-30

Nidhi Gupta

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN TH 135 Anurag Ve Raj Kuma CORAM: Present:- NIDHI GU Shruti Ma raised by th Haryana H objections the counsel However, t objections. orders. Fol the causelis INCOMP No.969-2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJA AT CHANDIGAR INCOMP No. 96 DIARY No.1063 Date of decision rag Verma Versus Kumar and others AM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NI None. HI GUPTA J. (Oral) The aforesaid petition was fil ti Mandhotra, Advocate. However, d by the Registry on 18.12.2025. As per Rule 9, Chapter I, Part ana High Court Rules and Orders, ctions have been raised by the Regist ounsel party, who filed it, to re-file w ever, the same was not taken back fo ctions. On failure, the case is to be li rs. Following note was displayed/pub auselist and website of this Hon'ble Co "All the Advocates/P collect the cases as men below which are lying 1 UNJAB AND HARYANA IGARH 969 of 2026 10636951 cision :-30.4.2026 …..Petitioner …..Respondent E NIDHI GUPTA as filed on 18.12.2025 by Ms. ever, certain objections were I, Part-A, Volume V, Punjab and rders, the petition, on which Registry is to be taken back by file within a period of 40 days. ack for refiling after removal of o be listed before the Court for ed/published by the Registry in Court on 23.1.2026:- es/Parties are requested to mentioned in the list attached ying pending in the Objection VIJAY ASIJA 2026.05.01 18.12 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Advocate objections, been listed further ord records. April 30, 2 Vijay Asija Whether spea Whether Repo INCOMP No.969-2026 Counter of DRR Branc today, within one month of this notice, failing w the Caveat Application Hon'ble Court on judi orders." Even after the publication of cate to collect his case for re-fi ctions, the needful was not done. Con listed before this Court in urgent list to There is no representation on b Keeping in view the aforesai er order is required to be passed. The l 30, 2026 r speaking/reasoned Yes / No r Reportable Yes / No 2 ranch and not taken back till onth of the date of publication ng which all the cases (except ations) will be listed before judicial side for appropriate tion of the note requesting the filing after rectification of e. Consequently, the matter has t list today. n on behalf of the petitioner. foresaid facts of the matter, no d. The file be consigned to the ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE VIJAY ASIJA 2026.05.01 18.12 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document