Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 17426 (RAJ)

PUSHP CHAND S/O SHRI HAR LAL v. JAIPUR VIDYUT VITRAN NIGAM LIMITED

CW/4452/2025 · 2026-02-12

Anand Sharma

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:6790] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 4452/2025 Pushp Chand S/o Shri Har Lal, Aged About 51 Years, Resident Of D/102, Chhawani, Ramchandrapura, Kota. ----Petitioner Versus 1. Jaipur Vidyut Vitran Nigam Limited, Through Its Chairman Cum Managing Director, Vidyut Bhawan, Janpath, Jyoti Nagar, Jaipur 2. Chief Personnel Officer, Jaipur Vidyut Vitran Nigam Limited (Personal Department), Registered Office Vidyut Bhawan, Jaipur-302005. 3. The Superintendent Engineer (M And P), Jaipur Vidyut Vitran Nigam Limited, Jaipur Discom, Kota. 4. Assistant Engineer (Mst), Jaipur Vidyut Vitran Nigam Limited, Kota. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Suresh Kashyap Ms. Sarita Choudhary For Respondent(s) : Mr. Shailesh Prakash Sharma HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA Order 12/02/2026 1. Petitioner has filed this writ petition, feeling aggrieved by transfer order dated 15.01.2025, whereby the petitioner was transferred from AEN (MST), JPD, Kota to AEN (ST), JPD, R Mandi. 2. It is stated by learned counsel for the petitioner that transfer order has been passed ignoring the fact that the persons, who were staying at the relevant place for longer time, were retained and ignoring the longer stay of the petitioner, he was transferred. [2026:RJ-JP:6790] (2 of 2) [CW-4452/2025] 3. It is admitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has already joined pursuant to transfer order, therefore, at this stage, no cause of action for pursuing this writ petition survives. However, he prays for liberty to make a representation before the competent authority for redressing his grievance with regard to his transfer. 4. In view of above, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous, with liberty to the petitioner to submit his representation. In case, any such representation is made, the same shall be considered by the respondents. 5. Pending application(s), if any, also stand(s), disposed of. (ANAND SHARMA),J DIVYA /199