Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010282422025 2026:GAU-AS:378 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./4089/2025 IMDAD PARBESH S/O MAINUL HOQUE, R/O SAONAIBERA PAM, P.S. JURIA, DIST. NAGAON, ASSAM. VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE PP, ASSAM. Advocate for the Petitioner : MR S M ABDULLAH P, MR. MD IMDAD,MD IMRAN,MD IMRAN,MD R ISLAM,MS F HUSSAIN Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, :: BEFORE :: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHIVJYOTI SAIKIA O R D E R 09.01.2026 Heard Mr. S.M. Abdullah P, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. R.R. Kaushik, the Addl. Public Prosecutor, Assam. Page No.# 2/3 2. This is an application under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023 whereby the petitioner Imdad Parbesh has prayed for releasing him on bail in respect of Nagaon P.S. Case No.906/2025. 3. Police had the information that on 12.11.2025 at about 4.30 P.M., the petitioner Imdad Parbesh would be depositing a huge cash amount in the cash deposit machine of HDFC Bank at Panigaon area under Nagaon Police Station. Police also had the information that the petitioner had collected the said money by committing cyber fraud and depositing the money in different bank accounts of different accomplices. Police apprehended the present petitioner and recovered a cash amount of ₹55,000/- from his possession. A Swift Car was also recovered from his possession. The petitioner confessed before the police that he has received money from his friends who fraudulently collected those from different persons. Police had searched his house also and recovered a cash amount of ₹8,30,000/-. 4. Mr. Abdullah has submitted that the petitioner was arrested on 13.11.2025 and since then he has been languishing in judicial custody. According to Mr. Abdullah, Sri Imtiaz Rizbi, who is the brother of the petitioner, runs a customer service point of a Bank and the said brother had kept the said amount of ₹8,30,000/- in the safe custody of the present petitioner. It is further submitted that on the day of occurrence the petitioner had withdrawn an amount of ₹2,30,000/- from the Bank account of his brother. 5. I have considered the submissions made by the learned counsel of both sides. 6. Under the given circumstances, considering the period of detention already undergone by the petitioner in custody, this Court is the opinion that the present petitioner Imdad Parbesh no longer deserves detain in custody for any further period of time. 7. The bail application is allowed. The petitioner Imdad Parbesh who was arrested in respect of Nagaon P.S. Case No.906/2025, shall be released on bail of ₹25,000/- Page No.# 3/3 with a surety of like amount to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nagaon, Assam. With the aforesaid direction, the bail application is disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant