IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CMPMO No.259 of 2026 Date of decision:24.07.2026 Jiwan Lal ...Petitioner Versus Acharu Ram & another ...Respondents Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Romesh Verma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner : Mr. Tek Chand Sharma, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Devender K. Sharma, Advocate. Romesh Verma, Judge (oral): Preliminary objection has been raised by learned counsel for the respondents that the present petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is not maintainable. He submits that against the dismissal of the application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act by the learned Additional District Judge, Sakaghat, District Mandi, H.P., the remedy available to the present petitioner is the appeal. 2. Faced with this situation, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present petition with liberty to file appropriate appeal in accordance with law. Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? -2- 3. Consequently, the instant petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty as prayed for, along with pending application(s), if any. (Romesh Verma) Judge 24th July, 2026. (vt)