Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 17421 (JHR)

UDAY GANJHU v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

A.B.A./3188/2026 · 2026-06-19

Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:17841 --1-- A.B.A. No. 3188 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI A.B.A. No. 3188 of 2026 ---- 1. Uday Ganjhu, S/o Basudev Ganjhu, aged about 32 years, R/o village – Bantha, PO and PS – Kunda, District – Chatra, Jharkhand 2. Rakesh Kumar @ Rakesh Ganjhu, S/o Hardev Ganjhu, aged about 18 years, R/o village – Battha, PO and PS – Kunda, District – Chatra, Jharkhand .... Petitioners -- Versus -- The State of Jharkhand .... Opposite Party ---- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI --- For the Petitioners :- Mr. Jeetendra Kr. Mishra, Advocate :- Mr. Kunal, Advocate For the State :- Mr. Bhola Nath Ojha, Advocate ---- 02/19.06.2026 Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioners as well as the learned counsel appearing for the State. 2. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Kunda P.S. Case No.07 of 2026 for the alleged offences registered under Sections 8, 27(a), 28, 29 and 30 of NDPS Act and Section 33 of Indian Forest Act pending in the Court of learned Sessions Judge-cum-Special Judge NDPS cases, Chatra. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case alleging that the petitioners were involved in cultivation of poppy plants on the forest land. He further submits that the land is of the forest department and that is not belonging to the petitioners. He then submits that the petitioners have got no criminal antecedent as disclosed in paragraph No.13 of the petition. He next submits that in identical situation co-accused persons 2026:JHHC:17841 --2-- A.B.A. No. 3188 of 2026 have already been granted anticipatory bail in ABA Nos.2004 of 2026 and 2191 of 2026. 4. Learned counsel appearing for the State opposed the prayer and submits that the allegations are there of cultivation of poppy plants on the forest land. 5. Considering that the land is of the forest department and that is not belonging to the petitioners and the petitioners have got no criminal antecedent as disclosed in paragraph No.13 of the petition and in identical situation co-accused persons have already been granted anticipatory bail in the aforesaid ABAs, I am inclined to provide anticipatory bail to the petitioners. 6. Accordingly, the petitioners, above named, are hereby directed to surrender before the learned Court within three weeks from today, and in the event of their surrender/arrest, the petitioners, above named, shall be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each, with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of learned Sessions Judge-cum-Special Judge NDPS cases, Chatra in connection with Kunda P.S. Case No.07 of 2026, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. (Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Dated 19.06.2026 Sangam/