Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 17421 (GAU)

SMTI RANU DEKA v. THE STATE OF ASSAM

Bail Appln./4106/2025 · 2026-01-05

Pranjal Das

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010280302025 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./4106/2025 SMTI RANU DEKA W/O HEMANTA DEKA, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE MANDAKATA, PS BAIHATA CHARIALI, DIST KAMRUP ASSAM 781121 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE PP, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. SAILENDRA DEKA, MR JITENDRA DAS Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRANJAL DAS ORDER Date : 06.01.2026 Heard Mr. S. Deka, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. D.P.Goswami, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. 2. The petitioner Ranu Deka has filed this application under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023 with a prayer for bail as she is behind bars since 14.11.2025 in connection with Baihata Chariali PS Case No.277/2025 under Section 108 of the Page No.# 2/3 BNS. 3. The allegation in the FIR dated 09.11.2025 lodged by the informant Bhabesh Deka is that on the previous day, i.e. on 08.11.2025, his elder brother Manav Deka committed suicide due to a social media post shared by the petitioner Ranu Deka. 4. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner who is seeking bail is a married lady having children and that the brother of the deceased was forcing for her marriage with the deceased. 5. Case Diary has been received. 6. Perused the relevant portion of the Case Diary including the statement of the present petitioner. 7. In the given facts and circumstances, I allow the bail petition. The accused petitioner named above is hereby allowed to go on bail of Rs.25,000/- with one surety of like amount to the satisfaction of the learned jurisdictional Court subject to the following conditions: 1. The petitioner shall co-operate with the investigation, 2. The petitioner shall not hamper or tamper with the evidence in any manner. 8. On violation of any of the above conditions, the learned court below is at liberty to cancel bail granted to the petitioner. 9. The bail application stands disposed of. 10. Send back the Case Diary. JUDGE Page No.# 3/3 Comparing Assistant