1 2026:CGHC:9315 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 783 of 2026 Akash Rochwani S/o Shri Shyam Lal Rochwani, Aged About 30 Years R/o Sindhi Colony, Police Station Civil Line Bilaspur, District- Bilaspur Chhattisgarh - 495001 ... Petitioner versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax, Aayakar Bhawan Raipur, District- Raipur (C.G.) Pin -492001 2 - Principle - 1 Income Tax Department Raipur, Civil Line Raipur, District- Raipur Chhattisgarh -492001 3 - Joint Director Investigation Wing Income Tax Naya Raipur 9th Floor Cbd Complex Atal Nagar, Sector 21, Naya Raipur District- Raipur Chhattisgarh-492001 4 - Commissioner Income Tax Bilaspur, Vyapar Vihar Bilaspur, District- Bilaspur Chhattisgarh -495001 ... Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. Curtis Collins, Advocate For Respondent No.1/State : Dr. Arham Siddiqui, Panel Lawyer For Respondents 3 & 4 : Mr. Ajay Kumarani, Advocate (Hon’ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi) Order on Board 23.02.2026 1. The petitioner has preferred this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking following relief(s):- “10.1 This Hon'ble Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents to produce entire record pertaining to the petitioner's case. BINI PRADEEP Digitally signed by BINI PRADEEP Date: 2026.02.25 10:19:08 +0530 2 10.2 That this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue suitable writ for ends of justice against the respondents. 10.3 That, this Hon'ble Court may issue writ of mandamus to respondent state of Chhattisgarh to enforce the fundamental right of the petitioners guaranteed under article 25 of the Constitution of India. 10.4 That this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue suitable writ for ends of justice against the respondents. 10.5 That this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct respondent no.2 to decide the representation dated 26.12.2025 annexure P/4. 10.6 Any other relief in the discretion of this Hon'ble Court. 10.7 Cost of the petition.” 2. After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of the Court to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to file appropriate petition. 3. Learned counsel for the respondents have no objection on the above prayer. 4. On due consideration, prayer is allowed and he is permitted to withdraw this petition with liberty as prayed for. 5. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. 6. Pending interlocutory application(s), if any, stands disposed of. Sd/- (Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi) Judge Bini