Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010084522015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3329] MONDAY,THE SECOND DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 871/2015 Between:
1. Y. PUJA SWAMY,, D/O. Y.V.KRISHNA SWAMY, AGED ABOUT: 17 YEARS, OCC: STUDENT, R/O. GAYATRI NAGAR, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT, A.P. REP. BY HER FATHER Y.V.KRISHNA SWAMY, S/O. Y.NARAYANA SWAMY,
...PETITIONER AND
1. MR NEERABH KUMAR PRASAD IAS, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, YOUTH ADVANCEMENT, TOURISM & CULTURE, GOVERNMENT OF A.P., A.P.SECRETARIAT, HYDERABAD
2. MRS SUMITA DAWARA IAS, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HIGHER EDUCATION,
GOVERNMENT OF A.P, SECRETARIAT, HYDERABAD. (RESPONDENTS 3 TO 5 IN W.P. ARE NOT NECESSARY PARTIES TO THIS CONTEMPT CASE)
...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to punish the respondents herein under the provisions of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 for their deliberate and willful disobedience of the Orders passed by the Hon'ble Court in W.P.No.10294/2015 on 17-03-2015 and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2015(APPL 785 OF 2015
2
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Pleased to permit the petitioner to implead the 3rd respondent herein as party respondent No.3 in C.C.No.871 of 2015 in the interest of justice and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. GUDURI VENKATESWARA RAO Counsel for the Contemnor(S):
1. The Court made the following:
3
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA CONTEMPT CASE NO:871 OF 2015 ORDER: This contempt case is filed against the respondents for willful disobedience of the orders dated 10.04.2015 in I.A. No.1 of 2015 in W.P.No.10294 of 2015.
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner(s).
3. When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner(s) submits that since the writ petition itself is closed, the present contempt case cannot be enforced. Hence, requested to close the contempt case.
4. Recording the said submission, the Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs.
Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in the contempt case shall stand closed. ________________________________ VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA, J 02.03.2026 BSP/TPS
4
140
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA
(closed)
Contempt Case No.871 of 2015
02.03.2026 BSP/TPS