[2026:RJ-JP:12805] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 2794/2026 Abdul Samad S/o Anwar, Aged About 63 Years, R/o Near Ramdev Ji Ka Chabutara, Bhisti Mohalla, Gandhi Nagar, Kishangarh, Police Station Gandhi Nagar, District Ajmer. At Present Ratna Rawat Ka Jaav, Near Poultry Farm, Chamda Ghar, Kishangarh, Police Station Gandhi Nagar, District Ajmer. (At Present In Central Jail, Ajmer). ----Petitioner Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Shyam Bihari Gautam For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jaiprakash Tiwari, PP with Mr. Gaurav Gupta, AGA Mr. Surender Singh, CI, PS Madanganj HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 27/03/2026 1. The petitioner has preferred this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.94/2025 registered at Police Station Madanganj, District Ajmer for offences under Sections 318(4), 316(2), 61(2) of BNS, 2023 and Sections 3, 5, 21 of the Banning of Unregulated Deposit Scheme Act, 2019. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that the petitioner is neither the director nor in a governing body of the company and is merely an employee. Petitioner is behind the bars [2026:RJ-JP:12805] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-2794/2026] since 27.01.2026 with criminal past of 16 cases arising out of mostly in similar matters. The trial of the case will take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner in further custody, consequently, the bail application deserves to be allowed. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. 5. On consideration of the rival submissions and material available on record and in light of submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner but without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner. 6. Consequently, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that the petitioner Abdul Samad S/o Anwar, be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing till conclusion of the trial with following further conditions:- (i) That the petitioner shall mark his presence before the SHO, Police Station Madanganj, District Ajmer in every 15 days of each month till conclusion of trial. (ii) The concerned SHO is directed to maintain a register for this purpose. In case, the petitioner fails to mark his presence in the concerned Police Station as directed above, the concerned SHO is directed to immediately report the matter to trial court in this regard. [2026:RJ-JP:12805] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-2794/2026] (iii) The petitioner shall not repeat any offence in future. (iv) If breach of any of the directions is reported or come to the notice of the trial court the same shall alone be a reason for learned Public Prosecutor to apply for cancellation of bail and trial court shall be at liberty to cancel the bail. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Chandan/47