Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 17419 (AP)

BHASKARA DEVASENA v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/4925/2026 · 2026-03-22

B Krishna Mohan

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010086562026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3233] MONDAY,THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN WRIT PETITION NO: 4925/2026 Between: 1. BHASKARA DEVASENA, W/O. LATE BHASKARA RAMURTHY, AGED ABOUT 77 YEARS, OCC HOUSE WIFE, R/O. C/O M MURALI KRISHNA D NO. 27/4/943, BALAJI NAGAR, GOWDA HOSTEL CENTRE,SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT PRESENTLY R/O.FLAT NO. 401, PLOT NO. 167, KAIZEN INDIRA NILAYAM, ROAD NO. 4, GUTTALABEGAMPET, KAKATIYA HILLS, MADAPOOR, HYDERABAD - 500081. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS AT VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI - 522237. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, TIRUPATHI DISTRICT, AT TIRUPATHI ERSTWHILE SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT - 517503. 3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, SULLURPET DIVISION, TIRUPATHI DISTRICT, ERSTWHILE SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT - 524121. 4. THE TAHSILDAR, TADA MANDAL, TIRUPATHI DISTRICT, ERSTWHILE SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT - 524401. ...RESPONDENT(S): 2 BKM,J W.P.No.4925 of 2026 Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus questioning the action of the 2ND respondent in not deleting the land an extent of land Ac.2.58 cents in Sy.No.205/5 (LP.No.1342) situated at Tada Kandriga Village, Tada Mandal, Tirupathi District Erstwhile SPSR Nellore District belongs to petitioner from the prohibitory property list under section 22A(1)(B) of Registration Act, 1908 is illegal, arbitrary, and consequentially direct the 4 Pattadar Passbook and Title deed in favour of the petitioner in respect of the land an extent of land Ac.2.58 cents in Sy.No.205/5 (LP.No. 1342) situated at Tada Kandriga Village, Tada Mandal, Tirupathi District and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Pleased to direct the respondent to delete the land an extent of land Ac.2.58 cents in Sy.No.205/5 (LP.No.1342) situated at Tada Kandriga Village, Tada Mandal, Tirupathi District Erstwhile SPSR Nellore District from the prohibitory property list under section 22A(1)(B) of Registration Act, 1908 by considering application dated 17.01.2026, pending disposal of Writ Petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. M K RAJ KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE 3 BKM,J W.P.No.4925 of 2026 The Court made the following Order: Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for the respondents. 2. This writ petition is filed questioning the action of the 2nd respondent in not deleting the land to an extent of land Ac.2.58 cents in Sy.No.205/5 (LP.No.1342) situated at Tada Kandriga Village, Tada Mandal, Tirupathi District erstwhile SPSR Nellore District. 3. On the other hand, the learned Assistant Government Pleader relying upon the written instructions of the 4th respondent dated 22.03.2026 submits that, the petitioner not filed any valid documents before the 4th respondent to show that as he is the legal heir of Bhaskara Kamakshamma. In the absence of the possession and enjoyment and also valid document to prove that she is the lawful legal heir of the original assignee i.e., Kamakshamma, it is not possible to grant pattadar passbook in her favour. 4. In view of the above said facts and circumstance, as the relief sought by the petitioner is to delete the subject property from the prohibited list, the petitioner is permitted to make application in Mee-seva enclosing all the necessary documents in support of her claim to the 2nd respondent within a period of four (04) weeks from the date of receipt of this order. On receipt of such application from the petitioner duly, the 2nd respondent is directed to consider and dispose of the same strictly in accordance with law by hearing all the parties concerned, including the petitioner giving due opportunity, upon 4 BKM,J W.P.No.4925 of 2026 verification of the records and the subject lands appropriate decision shall be taken on its own merits as expeditiously as possible preferably within a period of four (04) months thereafter. 5. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of. The written instructions of the 4th respondent dated 22.03.2026 shall be made as part of the court record. The Interim order, if any, deemed to have been vacated. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE B. KRISHNA MOHAN 23.03.2026 RMD 5 BKM,J W.P.No.4925 of 2026 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN WRIT PETITION NO: 4925/2026 23.03.2026 RMD