Prem Chand vs. HRTC & Anr. CMP No.16381 of 2026 in Ex. PT. No.2604 of 2025 24.07.2026 Present: Mr. Himanshu, Advocate, vice Mr. M.L. Sharma, Advocate, for the applicant/petitioner. Mr. Abhinav M. Goel, Advocate vice Mr. Raman Jamalta, Advocate, for the respondents. Learned vice counsel representing the respondents has produced a copy of office order dated 14.07.2026, passed by the Managing Director, HRTC, Shimla-3, which is taken on record. A perusal of the same reveals that the representation made by the applicant/petitioner has been rejected. Since the representation filed by the applicant/petitioner has been decided, the present application for revival of the execution petition has been rendered infructuous and accordingly disposed of. However, in case, the petitioner is aggrieved by the order passed by the respondents, he may avail an appropriate remedy in accordance with law. July 24, 2026 ( Jiya Lal Bhardwaj ) (ankit) Judge