5.as.wp.4092.2011.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 4092 OF 2011 Rajendra Bhuta Borse … Petitioner Versus State of Maharashtra and ors … Respondents *** None for Petitioner. Mr. Rishikesh Pawaskar a/w Mr. Rohal Patil for Respondent Nos.2 and 3. Ms. Vrishali Raje, AGP for Respondent-State. *** CORAM : M.M. SATHAYE, J. DATE : 12 OCTOBER, 2026 P.C. : 1. None appears for the Petitioner. 2. On 28.03.2012, following order was passed : “1 Heard the learned Advocates for the parties. 2 It is an admitted position that the petitioner had filed an Application for obtaining Caste Certificate, as the person belonging to Tokare Koli Caste and that application has been rejected by the SDO, Shirpur Division, Shirpur. It is an admitted position that the Petitioner has filed an Appeal against this order before the Scheduled Tribe Certificate Scrutiny Committee, Nandurbar and the same is pending. 3 The services of the Petitioner has been terminated only on the ground that the Petitioner has not produced the Caste Certificate. 4 In view of this factual situation, RULE. Mr. Mhaispurkar waives service on behalf of Respondent Nos.2 and 3 and the learned AGP waives service on behalf of Respondent Nos.1 and 4. Vina Khadpe 1 VINA ARVIND KHADPE Digitally signed by VINA ARVIND KHADPE Date: 2026.10.12 18:27:17 +0530 5.as.wp.4092.2011.doc 5 Liberty is granted to apply for interim relief and/or immediate final disposal of the Petition in case, Appeal filed by the Petitioner is allowed.” 3. No interim relief was granted in favour of the Petitioner. 4. Recently on 18.08.2026, following order was passed :- “1 On 8.7.2026, adjournment was sought on behalf of the Petitioner. Today, nobody appears for he Petitioner. 2 Stand over to 01.09.2026, as an opportunity to the Petitioner to appear and contest.” 5. on 5.10.2026, following order was passed :- “1 None for the Petitioner. 2. Stand over to 12.10.2026. To be listed for ‘dismissal’. 6. Today, the Petition is listed for dismissal. Nobody is appearing for the Petitioner. It appears that the Petitioner is not interested in proceeding with the matter. There is consistent default. 7. Writ petition is therefore dismissed for non-prosecution. 8. All concerned to act on duly authenticated or digitally signed QR verifiable copy of this order. (M.M. SATHAYE, J.) Vina Khadpe 2