SALIM MASOOD CHAUHAN v. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR
ABA/2774/2026 · 2026-10-09
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 17411 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 17411 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
912 ABA-2774-2026=924 ABA-2806-2026.DOC skt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 2774 OF 2026 AND ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 2806 OF 2026 Salim Masood Chauhan …Applicant Vs.
1. State of Maharashtra
2. State of Haryana …Respondents Mr. Aditya Parmar a/w. Pratiksha More i/b Hulyalkar for the Applicant. Mr. Swapnil V. Walve, APP for the Respondent No.1-State. PSI Anup Lavhate, Vimantal Police Station, Pune City. CORAM:
MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.
DATE :
9th OCTOBER, 2026 P. C.:
1. Heard Mr. Parmar, learned counsel appearing for the Applicant and Mr. Walve, learned APP for the State of Maharashtra.
2. In these Anticipatory Bail Applications, the Applicant is seeking pre-arrest bail in connection with the proceedings pending before learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Gurugram, Haryana.
3. Learned JMFC has issued non-bailable warrant as the Applicant was not attending the said Court. However, the Applicant can challenge the said order of learned JMFC, Gurugram 9th October, 2026
912 ABA-2774-2026=924 ABA-2806-2026.DOC skt in the jurisdictional court or even can apply to the learned JMFC Court seeking appropriate reliefs.
4. Accordingly, the Anticipatory Bail Applications are disposed of.
[MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.] 9th October, 2026