NAZIMA MALIK AND ANOTHER v. UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K (REVENUE) AND OTHERS
WP(C)/1427/2026 · 2026-07-07
Rahul Bharti
Writ Petition (Civil)body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 1741 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 1741 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR
WP(C) 1427/2026 CM(3762/2026).
Nazima Malik And Another.
…Applicant(s)/Petitioner(s)
Through: Mr. M. A. Wani, Advocate.
VERSUS
Union Territory Of J And K And Others.
…Respondent(s)
Through: None.
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAHUL BHARTI, JUDGE.
ORDER 07.07.2026
01. Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks liberty to withdraw the writ petition in order to do a course correction, as the petitioners actually intend to challenge a civil court’s order by laying a petition under article 227 of the Constitution of India.
02. Accordingly, the writ petition- WP(C) No. 1427/2026 stands dismissed as withdrawn with liberty granted to the petitioners to come up with a petition under article 227 of the Constitution of India to be restricted only against the respondents Nos. 5 to 8.
(RAHUL BHARTI)
JUDGE
SRINAGAR 07.07.2026 Bisma Jan.
03 Regular