Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 17409 (KAR)

SMT. M. G OMANA v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/31037/2025 · 2026-03-05

R Devdas

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:13482 WP No. 31037 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF MARCH, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS WRIT PETITION NO. 31037 OF 2025 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: SMT. M. G OMANA WIFE OF M. GOPAL, AGE ABOUT 52 YEARS, OCCUPATION COOLIE, RESIDENT OF MUKKODALU- HODAKANA VILLAGE, MADAKERI TALUK KODAGU DISTRICT-571251. …PETITIONER (BY SMT. SUMANA M HEGDE., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, BY ITS SECRETARY, M.S. BUILDING, BANGALORE-560 001. 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, KODAGU DISTRICT-571 201. 3. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, TALUK OFFICE, MADAKERI TALUK-571 201. 4. THE TAHASIDAR, MADAKERI- 571 201. 5. THE AKRAMA-SAKRAMA COMMITTEE, MADAKERI-571 201 Digitally signed by DHARMALINGAM Location: High Court Of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:13482 WP No. 31037 of 2025 REP BY CHAIRMAN. 6. THE REVENUE INSPECTOR, MADAKERI HOBLI, MADAKKERI TALUK-571 201. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT.B.P. RADHA., AGA) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED REPORT DATED 02/12/2024 AT ANNEXURE-F GIVEN BY THE 6TH RESPONDENT AS THE SAME IS WITHOUT AUTHORITY OF LAW AND AS THE SAME IS NULL AND VOID BASED ON FALLS INFORMATION CONTRARY TO THE REPORT GIVEN BY THE CONCERNED AT EARLIER POINT OF TIME & ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo dated 05.03.2026 seeking leave of this Court to withdraw the writ petition and raise a challenge to the order passed by the Deputy Commissioner during the course of these proceedings. The memo is taken on record, subject to all just exceptions. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:13482 WP No. 31037 of 2025 Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn while reserving liberty to the petitioner as prayed for. Sd/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE KLY