Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 17407 (JHR)

SITA RAM DANGI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

Cont.(Cvl)/202/2025 · 2026-06-16

Deepak Roshan

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:17818 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cont. Case (Civil) No. 202 of 2025 …… Sita Ram Dangi, aged about 68 years, Son of Late Ritu Raj Dangi, Resident of Village-Dipugarha, Co-operative Colony, P.O. & P.S. Hazaribagh, District-Hazaribagh (Jharkhand). …. Petitioner(s) -VERSUS- 1. The State of Jharkhand. 2. Mr. Sashi Prakash Singh, the Director, Primary School Education and Literacy Department, Government of Jharkhand, NDI Building, P.O. and P.S. Dhurwa, District- Ranchi. 3. Mr. Uma Shankar Singh, the Secretary, Human Resources Development Department, Government of Jharkhand, Ranch, NDI Building, P.O. and P.S. Dhurwa, District-Ranchi. 4. Smt. Nancy Sahay, the Deputy Commissioner, Hazaribagh, P.O. & P.S. Hazaribagh, District-Hazaribagh. 5. Mr. Akash Kumar, the District Superintendent of Education, Hazaribagh, P.O. & P.S. Hazaribagh, District- Hazaribagh. …..Opposite Party (s) …… CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Om Prakash Singh, Adv For the Opposite Party (s) : Mr. Binit Chandra, A.C. to AAG-III …… 9/ 16.06.2026 From the show cause filed by O.P. No.5, dated 12.06.2026, it appears that the earned leave, GPF, and Gratuity order has already been issued in favour of the petitioner. However, the interest portion has not been calculated, as per the petitioner. 2. Having regard to the fact, no contempt is made out. However, since interest has not been paid, the interest of justice would be sufficed by directing the petitioner to file a calculation with respect to interest or any other calculation error before the D.S.E, Hazaribagh. The concerned respondent, after verification of records, shall pay the same 2026:JHHC:17818 2 to the petitioner as early as possible, preferably within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of such calculation. 3. Accordingly, the contempt application stands disposed of. 4. The personal appearance of the proposed contemnor is dispensed with. (Deepak Roshan, J) 16.06.2026 Amardeep/ Uploaded on 22.06.2026