Parmeshwar Prasad Kashyap And Anr. v. Smt.mongra Bai
SA/499/2013 · 2026-02-18
Shri Bibhu Datta Guru
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 17407 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 17407 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
2026:CGHC:8782
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR SA No. 499 of 2013 1 - Parmeshwar Prasad Kashyap And Anr. S/o Late Choudhari Prasad Kashyap Aged About 50 Years R/o Bhandi, Tah. And P.S. Bilaspur, Distt. Bilaspur C.G., At Present Address- Devnandan Nagar, Phase-1, Seepat, P.S. Seepat, Tah. Bilaspur, Distt. Bilaspur C.G. 2 - Abhuday Kumar S/o Parmeshwar Prasad Aged About 23 Years R/o Bhandi, Tah. And P.S. Bilaspur, Distt. Bilaspur C.G., At Present Address- Devnandan Nagar, Phase-1, Seepat, P.S. Seepat, Tah. Bilaspur, Distt. Bilaspur C.G.
... Appellants versus 1 - Smt.Mongra Bai W/o Ramkishun Kashyap Aged About 59 Years R/o Gadhwat, Tah. And P.S. Bilaspur, Distt. Bilaspur C.G. 2 - Smt. Brihaspati Bai (Died Through Lrs) As Per Honble Court Order Dated 15-09-2025. 2(a) - Rameshwari Devi W/o Jaynarayan Aged About 45 Years R/o Village- Basha, Tahsil- Beltara, District- Bilaspur C.G. 2(b) - Sulochani W/o Kanhaiya Aged About 43 Years R/o Village- Bitkula, Tahsil- Seepat, District Bilaspur C.G. SOURABH BHILWAR Digitally signed by SOURABH BHILWAR Date: 2026.02.20 10:46:44 +0530
2 2(c) - Laxmi Patanwar W/o Dulendra Patanwar Aged About 40 Years R/o Village- Bitkula, Tahsil- Seepat, District Bilaspur C.G. 2(d) - Raju Kashyap S/o Chaitram Aged About 36 Years R/o Village- Bhadi, Tahsil-Beltara, District Bilaspur C.G. 2(e) - Rajni Bai Baiswade W/o Lalit Kumar Aged About 32 Years R/o Village- Donganala, Tahsil- Pali, District- Korba C.G. 3 - Smt. Saraswati Bai W/o Dewan Kashyap Aged About 42 Years R/o Akaltari, P.S. Ratanpur, Tah. Bilaspur, Distt. Bilaspur C.G. 4 - State Of Chhattisgarh Thru- The Collector, Bilaspur C.G.
…. Respondent(s) (Cause title is taken from CIS) For Appellant(s) : Mr. S.S. Barik, Advocate For Private Respondents : Ms. Harneet Kaur, Advocate For Respondent/ State : Mr. Anand Gupta, Dy. Govt. Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta Guru
Judgment on Board 19/02/2026
1. The present Second Appeal has been filed by the defendants/ appellants herein under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, assailing the impugned judgment and decree dated 22.10.2013 passed by the learned First Additional District Judge to the 4th Additional Judge, Bilaspur (C.G.) in Civil Appeal No. 17-A/2013 (Parmeshwar Prasad & Anr. vs. Smt. Mongra Bai & Ors.), affirming the judgment and decree dated 23.01.2013 passed by the learned Second Civil Judge, Class-I, Bilaspur (C.G.), in Civil Suit No. 13-A/2012, whereby the civil appeal filed by the appellant/defendants was dismissed. For the sake of
3 convenience, the parties shall hereinafter be referred to as per their status before the Trial Court.
2. Pursuant to the order dated 18.08.2025, on the request of both the parties stating that they have amicably settled their dispute, the matter was directed to be listed before the learned Additional Registrar (Judicial) for recording of their statements with regard to the settlement. However, due to the absence of appellant No. 2, his statement could not be recorded and the matter was again
directed to be listed before the learned Additional Registrar (Judicial) on 17/02/2026.
3. As per Office record and notes of the Additional Registrar (J), it has been reported that on 17/02/2026, the appellant/ defendant No.2 (Abhyuday Kumar) appeared before him and his statement was recorded wherein he has accepted the fact that the dispute was amicably settled by executing a mutual agreement deed (D-1) which has been filed alongwith I.A. No.01/2025, application for compromise under Order 23 Rule 3 of CPC.
4.
Learned counsel for the parties jointly submit that the dispute between the parties has been settled and the parties are ready and willing to fulfill the conditions enumerated in the mutual agreement deed and as per their statements recorded before the Additional Registrar (J).
5. For the sake of convenience, the entire scanned copy of the mutual agreement deed dated 25.08.2025 is shown as under :
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
6. From the above, it appears that the disputes between the parties have been settled by executing a mutual agreement deed. The mutual agreement deed will be a part of the records. In the above circumstances, the appeal is disposed of in terms of the mutual
12 agreement deed dated 25.08.2025. The mutual agreement deed shall form part of the judgment and decree.
7. Consequently, all the pending interlocutary applications stand
disposed of.
8. A decree be drawn accordingly.
Sd/-
(Bibhu Datta Guru)
Judge
$. Bhilwar