Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 17405 (AP)

Elipe Aruna v. Edupuganti Bhaskar (Plaintiff)

CRP/750/2025 · 2026-02-10

Ravi Cheemalapati

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010085962025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH WEDNESDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI CIVIL REVISION PETITION Between: 1. ELIPE ARUNA, W/O. LATE VEERANAPU ROBBY DAYANAND, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, JUNIOR ASSISTANT, ZILLA PARISHAD, KAKINADA, R/O.D.NO.2 VILLAGE, KAKINADA RURAL. 2. VEERNAPU VIJAYA JOYCE, D/O. LATE DAYANAND, AGED ABOUT 12 YEARS, R/O.D.NO.2 SWASTHASALA CHEEDIGA VILLAGE, KAKINADA RURAL. 3. VEERNAPU ANAND, S/O. LATE VEERNAPU ROBBY DAYANAND, AGED ABOUT 11 YEARS, R/O.D.NO.2 SWASTHASALA CHEEDIGA VILLAGE, KAK (PETITIONER NO.2 AND 3 ARE BEING MINORS REPRESENTED BY THEIR NATURAL GUARDIAN/ MOTHER I.E., PETITIONER NO.L HEREIN) 1. EDUPUGANTI BHASKAR PLAINTIFF, S/o. Koteswara Rao, aged about 54 years, R/o D.No. 6 District. Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein, the High Court may be pleased to set aside the Order dated 22.11.2024 in l.A.No.411 of 2024 in IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 750/2025 ELIPE ARUNA, W/O. LATE VEERANAPU ROBBY DAYANAND, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, JUNIOR ASSISTANT, ZILLA PARISHAD, KAKINADA, R/O.D.NO.2-656/1, BEHIND SWASTHASALA CHEEDIGA VILLAGE, KAKINADA RURAL. VEERNAPU VIJAYA JOYCE, D/O. LATE VEERNAPU ROBBY DAYANAND, AGED ABOUT 12 YEARS, R/O.D.NO.2-656/1, BEHIND SWASTHASALA CHEEDIGA VILLAGE, KAKINADA RURAL. VEERNAPU ANAND, S/O. LATE VEERNAPU ROBBY DAYANAND, AGED ABOUT 11 YEARS, R/O.D.NO.2-656/1, BEHIND SWASTHASALA CHEEDIGA VILLAGE, KAKINADA RURAL. (PETITIONER NO.2 AND 3 ARE BEING MINORS REPRESENTED BY THEIR NATURAL GUARDIAN/ MOTHER I.E., PETITIONER NO.L ...PETITIONER(S) AND EDUPUGANTI BHASKAR PLAINTIFF, S/o. Koteswara Rao, aged about 54 years, R/o D.No. 6-55, Pedavegi Village, Pedavegi Mandal, Eluru ...RESPONDENT Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein, the High Court may be pleased to set aside the Order dated 22.11.2024 in l.A.No.411 of 2024 in IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3332] WEDNESDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI ELIPE ARUNA, W/O. LATE VEERANAPU ROBBY DAYANAND, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, JUNIOR ASSISTANT, ZILLA PARISHAD, 656/1, BEHIND SWASTHASALA CHEEDIGA VEERNAPU ROBBY 656/1, BEHIND SWASTHASALA CHEEDIGA VILLAGE, KAKINADA RURAL. VEERNAPU ANAND, S/O. LATE VEERNAPU ROBBY DAYANAND, 656/1, BEHIND INADA RURAL. (PETITIONER NO.2 AND 3 ARE BEING MINORS REPRESENTED BY THEIR NATURAL GUARDIAN/ MOTHER I.E., PETITIONER NO.L ...PETITIONER(S) EDUPUGANTI BHASKAR PLAINTIFF, S/o. Koteswara Rao, aged about Village, Pedavegi Mandal, Eluru ...RESPONDENT Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein, the High Court may be pleased to set aside the Order dated 22.11.2024 in l.A.No.411 of 2024 in 2 O.S.No.30 of 2020 on the file of the Principal Civil Judge (Senior Division), Eluru IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings in O.S.No.30 of 2020 on the file of the Principal Civil Judge (Senior Division), Eluru, pending disposal of above C.R.P Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. SHAIK MOHAMMED ISMAIL Counsel for the Respondent: 1. 3 The Court made the following order: Aggrieved by the common order dated 22.11.2024 passed in Interlocutory Application No.411 of 2024 in Original Suit No.30 of 2020 on the file of the Court of Principal Civil Judge (Senior Division), Eluru, the present Civil Revision Petition is filed. 2. Ms D.V.R.Harshitha, learned counsel, representing Sri Shaik Mohammed Ismail, learned counsel for the petitioners, submits that the matter has already been disposed of by the Principal Senior Judge (Senior Division) Eluru and nothing remains for adjudication and that the Civil Revision Petition has become infructuous. 3. As per the details of the Case Information System placed on record by the Registry also, the Suit in O.S No.30 of 2020 on the file of the Court of Principal Senior Judge (Senior Division), Eluru was decreed with costs on 25.07.2025. 4. In view of the above, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed. _____________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI Date: 11.02.2026. MP 4 148 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 750 of 2025 11.02.2026 MP