[2026:RJ-JP:1605] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 7642/2003 1. Savitri Devi W/o Shri Heera Lal Verma, aged about 40 years, R/o Village Bhadwari, Panchayat Samiti Khandela, Distt. Sikar. 2. Prem Meena W/o Shri Ramkuwar, aged about 28 Years, R/o Vill. Garhi Khanpur, Panchayat Samiti Khandela, Distt. Sikar. 3. Kamla Swami W/c Shri Kasiram, aged about 45 Years, R/o Vill. Suratram Ki Dhani, Panchayat Samiti Khandela, Distt. Sikar. 4. Manju Devi W/o Shri Kailash Chand, aged about 26 Years, R/o Vill. Madho Ka Bas, Panchayat Samiti Khandela, Distt. Sikar. 5. Santosh Devi W/o Shri Gyan Chand, aged about 26 Year, R/o Bapu Basti, Jugalpura, Panchayat Samiti Khandela, Distt. Sikar. 6. Madan Kanwar W/o Shri Ratan Singh, aged about 38 Years, R/ o Vill. Sukh Singh Ka Bas, Panchayat Samiti Khandela, Distt. Sikar. 7. Sumitra Devi W/o Shri Deen Bandhu Sharma, aged 45 Years, R/0 Vill. Hamirpura, Panchayat Samiti Khandela, Distt. Sikar. 8. Sumitra Devi W/o Shri Girdhari Lal, aged about 25 Years, R/o Vill. Dangya Ki Dhani Panchayat Samiti Khandela, Distt. Sikar. 9. Jiwankala W/o Shri Sukhram, aged about 32 Years, R/o Vill. Bakwar, Panchayat Samiti Khandela, Distt. Sikar. 10. Usha Devi Bhargva W/o Shri Ravi Shankar, aged about 35 Years, R/o Vill. Chala-C, Panchayat Samiti Neem Ka Thana, Distt. Sikar. 11. Munni Devi D/o Shri Brij Mohan, aged about 40 Years, R/O Vill. Chala A, Panchayat Samiti Neem Ka Thana, Distt. Bikar. 12. Uchalav Kanwar W/o Shri Shimbhu Singh, aged about 32 Years, R/o Vill. Guhala-D, Panchayat Samiti Neem Ka Thana, Distt. Sikar. [2026:RJ-JP:1605] (2 of 5) [CW-7642/2003] 13. Kiran Meena W/o Shri Sharwan Kumar, aged about 29 Years, R/o Vill. Naya Bas-B, Panchayat Samiti Neem Ka Thana, Distt. Sikar. 14. Rukmani Devi W/o Shri Bhagirath Mal Kumawat, aged about 42 Years, R/o Vill. Chala-D, Panchayat Samiti Neem Ka Thana, Distt. Bikar. 15. Chetanand D/o Shri Rati Ram Meena, aged about 29 Years, R/o Vill. Naya Bas-A, Panchayat Samiti Neem Ka Thana, Distt. Sikar. 16. Sunita Sharma D/o Shri Damodar Prasad Sharma, aged about 25 Years, R/o Vill. Chala-B, Panchayat Samiti Neem Ka Thana, Distt. Sikar. 17. Ratna Sharma W/o Shri Damodar Sharma, aged about 30 Years, R/o Vill. Guhala-G, Panchayat Samiti Neem Ka Thana, Distt. Sikar. 18. Veenita Sharma W/o Shri Radheshyam Sharma, aged about 30 Years, Rio Vill. Jassi Ka Bas, Panchayat Samiti Neem Ka Thana, Distt. Sikar. 19. Sunita Tailor W/o Shri Birju Tailor, aged about 28 Years, R/o Vill. Guhala-A, Panchayat Samiti Neem Ka Thana, Distt. Sikar. 20. Santosh Devi W/o Shri Harlal Singh, aged about 23 years, Rio Vill. Khatiwala Garh Bhopji, Panchayat Samiti Khandela, Distt. Sikar. 21. Manju Devi W/o Shri Ram Singh, aged about 22 years, R/o Vill. Khatiwala Garh Bhopji, Panchayat Samiti Khandela, Distt. Sikar. 22. Maya Sharma W/o Shri Murari Lal Sharma, aged about 30 Years, R/o Vill. Garhi Khanpur, Panchayat Samiti Khandela, Distt. Sikar. 23. Sajjan Kanwar W/o Shri Kalyan Singh, aged sbout 50 Years, R/o Vill. Madho Ka Bas, Panchayat Samiti Khandela, Distt. Sikar. [2026:RJ-JP:1605] (3 of 5) [CW-7642/2003] 24. Santosh Devi W/o Shri Narendra Kumar, aged about 30 Years, R/o Vill. Suratram Ki Dhani, Panchayat Samiti Khandela, Distt.Sikar. 25. Basanti Devi W/o Shri Ramswaroop Meena, aged about 35 Years, R/o Vill. Hamirpura, Panchayat Samiti Khandela, Distt. Sikar. 26. Santosh Devi W/o Shri Dhuraram, aged about 26 Years, R/o Vill. Dangya Ki Dhani, Panchayat Samiti Khandela, Distt. Sikar. 27. Prem Devi W/o Shri Ratan Lal, aged about 28 Years, R/o Vill. Kouwat, Panchayat Samiti Khandela, Distt. Sikar. 29. Bather Kanwar W/o Shri Banne Singh, aged about 40 Years, R/o Vill. Sukh Singh Ka Bas, Panchayat Samiti Khandela, Distt. Sikar. 29. Sharwani Devi W/o Shri Mohan Das, aged about 40 Years, R/o Vill. Jogla Jhohara, Panchayat. Samiti Khandela, Distt. Sikar. 30. Premeshwari W/o Shri Satyanarain Sharma, aged about 42 Years, R/o Vill. Yadkari, Panchayat Samiti Khandela, Distt. Sikar. 31. Geeta Devi W/o Shri Chunni Lal, aged about 28 Years, R/o Bapu Basti, Jugalpura, Panchayat Samiti Khandela, Distt. Sikar. 32. Pushpa Sharma W/o Shri Gopal Sharma, aged about 45 Years, R/o Vill, Chala-A, Panchayat Samiti Neem Ka Thana, Distt. Sikar. 33. Godawari Devi W/o Shri Murlidhar, aged about 45 Years, R/o Vill. Chala-C, Panchayat Samiti Neem Ka Thana, Distt. Sikar. 34. Pushpa Pareek W/o Shri Suva Lal Pareek, aged about 40 Years, R/o Vill. Chala-C, Panchayat Samiti Neem Ka Thana, Distt. Sikar. 35. Pappi Devi W/o Shri Tak Bahadur, aged about 32 Years, R/o Vill. Guhala-D, Panchayat Samiti Neem Ka Thana, Distt. Sikar. 36. Rukmani W/c Late Shri Babu Lal Meena aged about 30 Years, [2026:RJ-JP:1605] (4 of 5) [CW-7642/2003] R/o Vill. Naya Bas-A, Samiti Neem Ka Thana, Distt. Sikar. ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan through its Secretary, Women and Child Development Department, Government of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. Director, Women and Child Development Department, Government of Rajasthan, Jaipur. 3. Chif Executive Officer, Zila Parishad, Sikar. 4. Block Development Officer, Neem Ka Thana, District Sikar. 5. Block Development Officer, Khandela, District Sikar. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Dinesh Yadav For Respondent(s) : Mr. Akash Gaur, Dy.G.C with Mr. Kailash Chand Gupta HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA Order 15/01/2026 1. Petitioners have filed this joint petition against the letter dated 24.11.2003 issued by the Chief Executive Officer Zila Parishad, Sikar, wherein he gave general directions to the Development Officer Panchayat Samiti, Khandela as well as to Child Development Project Officer for examining the qualification and eligibility of Anganbari Karyakarta/Sahayika and in case, any Anganbari Karyakarta or Sahayika did not possess the necessary qualifications, their services should be terminated. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners has utterly failed to show that any sort of cause of action accrued to the petitioners on the basis of such letter dated 24.11.2003. In the entire writ petition, the petitioners have not disclosed their qualifications nor [2026:RJ-JP:1605] (5 of 5) [CW-7642/2003] have they produced anything to show that any individual order has been passed for terminating the services of the petitioner. In the aforesaid circumstances, in absence of any cause of action, the writ petition filed by the petitioner is not maintainable and is hereby dismissed. (ANAND SHARMA),J NEERU/13