CRWP-5555 IN THE (147) LAKSHMI D STATE OF H CORAM: Present: MANISHA B CRM-W-685 1. CRWP-5555 1. Constitution o the official re petitioners at t their represent 2. submitted that 5555-2026 (O&M) (1) THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB CHANDIGARH CR Da MI DEVI AND ANOTHER Versus
OF HARYANA AND OTHERS HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MA Mr. Mukesh Yadav, Advocate for Ms. Himani Arora, DAG, Haryan ****
HA BATRA, J. (ORAL) 685-2026 Application is allowed as prayed f 5-2026 The present petition has been fil tion of India seeking issuance of a w cial respondents No.1 to 3 to protect rs at the hands of respondents No.4 resentation dated 08.05.2026 (Annexu At the very outset, learned coun that the petitioners have recently JAB AND HARYANA AT ARH CRWP-5555-2026 (O&M) Date of decision : 11.05.2026 ... Petitioners
...Respondents E MANISHA BATRA
ate for the petitioners aryana rayed for. een filed under Article 226 of the of a writ of mandamus directing rotect the life and liberty of the No.4 to 10 and to take action on nnexure P-7). d counsel for the petitioners has cently filed a representation on AMIT SHARMA 2026.05.11 17:53 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CRWP-5555 08.05.2026 be raising their g has not yet be further submit appropriate di Police, Gurug petitioners and 3. 4. behalf of the r in due course during the cou 5. commenting a disposed of at aforesaid rep petitioners wit order in accord petitioners, the in order to pro 11.05.2026 Amit Sharma 5555-2026 (O&M) (2) 26 before the Commissioner of Police heir grievances as mentioned in the p yet been considered and no action h submitted that at this stage, the petiti iate directions are issued to respond Gurugram to decide the aforesaid r rs and take necessary action thereon. Notice of motion. Ms. Himani Arora, DAG, Harya f the respondents-State and submits th course. Let a complete set of the pap he course of the day. In view of the limited prayer mad ting anything on the merits of the c of at this stage with a direction to res d representation dated 08.05.2026 rs within a period of 15 days from to accordance with law. Needless to say, rs, the official respondents would pro to protect their life and liberty. Whether speaking/reasoned:
   Police, Gurugram (Annexure P-7) the present petition but the same ction has been taken thereon. He petitioners would be satisfied if spondent No.2-Commissioner of said representation filed by the reon. Haryana, has advance notice on mits that the needful will be done he paperbook be supplied to her r made by the petitioners, without f the case, the present petition is to respondent No.2 to decide the .2026 (Annexure P-7) of the rom today, by passing a speaking to say, if any threat is found to the ld provide them adequate security (MANISHA BATRA)
JUDGE ned:- Yes/No

AMIT SHARMA 2026.05.11 17:53 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.