Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010283012025 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./4142/2025 CHANDAN DAS S/O BASHA DAS R/O VILL- GARO DUKAN DASPARA (NORTH SALMARA PART-I), P.S. ABHAYAPURI, DIST. BONGAIGAON, ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REP BY THE PP, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. T K MISRA, MR. A. GAYAN,MR. P K MUNIR Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRANJAL DAS ORDER Date : 06.01.2026 Heard Mr. T.K. Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. D.P.Goswami, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. 2. The petitioner Chandan Das has filed this application under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023 with a prayer for bail as he is behind bars since 03.12.2025 in Page No.# 2/3 connection with Abhayapuri Police Station Case No. 265/2025_registered under Section 331 (4)/305 (a) / 310 (2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. 3. The allegation in the FIR dated 29.11.2025 lodged by the informant Ajay Shankar Das is that on 26.11.2025 at around 12 a.m. in the midnight after he and his family members had gone to bed, some miscreants broke open the door and entered and sprayed some substances making the family members unconscious. They have committed robbery in their house, taking away gold ornaments, cash, etc. The petitioner was arrested during investigation, and he is stated to be the cousin of the informant. 4. It is submitted by the petitioner’s counsel, that the petitioner had worked on some interiors of the house of the informant, and during which he had taken some photographs and unfortunately, the photographs became viral and fell into wrong hands and was misused to commit the alleged offences. It is submitted that the petitioner was in police custody remand for three days wherein he was thoroughly interrogated. 5. The case diary has been received. 6. It is submitted by the learned Addl.Public Prosecutor that the present petitioner Chandan Das is stated to be the mastermind of the alleged offence and taking advantage of his proximity to the family and the relative, he along with the other persons committed the robbery at night. Stolen property is stated to have been partly recovered. 7. Considering the nature of alleged offences and adverse materials revealed and the fact that the investigation is still in progress, the instant bail application stands rejected at this stage. Page No.# 3/3 8. Return back the Case Diary. JUDGE Comparing Assistant