APHC010083072026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] THURSDAY,THE NINETEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 4837/2026 Between: MULI GANGA MAHESWAR REDDY, S/O BAYAPU REDDY, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, OCC CULTIVATION, RESIDING AT 5-1-43, BRAMHMANNAM PALLI, PULIVENDULA, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. ANDHRA PRADESH - 516390. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 522237 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, Y. S. R. KADAPA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. - 516001 3. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, PULIVENDULA, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. - 516390 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, PULIVENDULA URBAN POLICE STATION, PULIVENDULA TOWN, Y. S. R. KADAPA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. - 516390 5. GOWKANAPALLE MANOJ KUMAR REDDY, , S/O. VEERA REDDY, AGE 44 YEARS, OCC CULTIVATION, R/O. 5-1-352, BRAHMANAPALLE, PULIVENDULA MANDAL, Y. S. R. KADAPA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH- 516390. 2 Dr. YLR, J W.P.No.4837 of 2026 Dated 19.02.2026 ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: V NITESH Counsel for the Respondent(S): GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER: The Writ Petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following relief:- “…to issue a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus especially against respondents 3 and 4 herein in calling the petitioners herein under the pressure and influence of the unofficial respondent no 5 herein to the police station even without there being any FIR pending against the petitioner and further forcing the petitioner to settle the Financial Disputes with the unofficial respondent no 5 herein under the threat of illegal arrest as being arbitrary illegal and violation of Article 14 19 21 and 300A of Constitution of India apart from violate of Principles of Natural Justice and consequently direct the Respondents No 3 and 4 not to harass or call the petitioner herein to the police station without there being any crime registered against the petitioner and not to interfere in the financial disputes pending between the Petitioner and unofficial respondent no 5 and to pass…” 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Government Pleader. 3. Mr. V. Nitesh, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that the petitioner was unnecessarily called to the police station and was compelled to settle alleged financial disputes with respondent No.5. 3 Dr. YLR, J W.P.No.4837 of 2026 Dated 19.02.2026 4. Sri P. Ajay Babu, learned Assistant Government Pleader, submits that respondent No.5 lodged a report before respondent No.3. Upon receipt of the said report, respondent No.3 conducted a preliminary enquiry and found that financial disputes are pending between the petitioner and respondent No.5. After completion of the preliminary enquiry, the parties were advised to avail appropriate remedies before the competent Court. 5. Recording the above submissions, the Writ Petition is disposed of, directing respondent Nos.3 and 4 not to further call the petitioner to the police station unnecessarily. 6. With the above observations and directions, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, interlocutory applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. _________________________ DR. Y. LAKSHMANA RAO, J Date: 19.02.2026 RSI 4 Dr. YLR, J W.P.No.4837 of 2026 Dated 19.02.2026 192 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO WRIT PETITION No.4837 of 2026 Date: 19.02.2026 RSI