JANKI PRASAD SAW ALLIAS RAGHU v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
Cr.A(SJ)/431/2026 · 2026-06-19
Rajesh Kumar
Criminal Appealbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 17394 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 17394 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2026:JHHC: 17871 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. Appeal (S.J) No.431 of 2026 ---------
Janki Prasad Saw @ Raghu, aged about 47 Years, son of Gujjar Mahato, resident of Madhugora, P.O Birajpur, P.S. Barwadda, District - Dhanbad. ….. Appellant Versus
1. The State of Jharkhand
2. Sushil Hembram, son of Late Barka Hembram, resident of village – Radhanagar, Post – Birajpur, P.S. Barwadda, District - Dhanbad. ..... Respondents ---------
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR
--------- For the Appellant : Ms. Sonal Sodhani, Advocate For the State : Mrs. Nehala Sharmin, Spl.P.P For the Resp. No.02 : Ms. Priya Saw, Advocate Mr. V. K. Tiwari, Advocate
--------- 06/ Dated: 19
th June, 2026
1. The present criminal appeal has been filed against the
order taking cognizance dated 10.10.2025, passed by the court of learned Special Judge SC/ST Act, Dhanbad, in Barwadda P.S Case No.176 of 2025, corresponding to SC/ ST Case No.73 of 2025, whereby cognizance for the offence under Sections 126(2)/ 115(2)/ 352/ 351(2) of B.N.S and Sections 3(1)(s), 3(1) (r) and 3(1)(y) of the SC/ST (POA) Act, has been taken against the present appellant.
2. After some argument, learned counsel for the appellant seeks permission to withdraw the present appeal with a liberty to work out her remedy in accordance with law.
3. Learned Special P.P and learned counsel for the respondent No.02 are present.
4. With the aforesaid liberty, the present criminal appeal stands disposed of as withdrawn.
5. Pending interlocutory application being I.A. No.4409 of 2026 stands disposed of.
(Rajesh Kumar, J.) 19th June, 2026 Ravi-Chandan/- Uploaded on 22.06.2026