SALIM MASOOD CHAUHAN v. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR
ABA/2766/2026 · 2026-10-09
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 17393 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 17393 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
911 ABA-2766-2026=924 ABA-2806-2026.DOC skt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 2766 OF 2026 AND ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 2806 OF 2026 Salim Masood Chauhan …Applicant Vs.
1. State of Maharashtra
2. State of Haryana …Respondents Mr. Aditya Parmar a/w. Pratiksha More i/b Hulyalkar for the Applicant. Mr. Swapnil V. Walve, APP for the Respondent No.1-State. PSI Anup Lavhate, Vimantal Police Station, Pune City. CORAM:
MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.
DATE :
9th OCTOBER, 2026 P. C.:
1. Heard Mr. Parmar, learned counsel appearing for the Applicant and Mr. Walve, learned APP, for the State of Maharashtra.
2. In these Anticipatory Bail Applications, the Applicant is challenging the order dated 16th May 2025 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Gurugram, Haryana in Case No. NACT-628-2020, by which the Applicant-Salim Masood Chauhan has been declared as proclaimed person as he was not attending 9th October, 2026
911 ABA-2766-2026=924 ABA-2806-2026.DOC skt the trial. The Applicant can very well approach the learned Trial Court seeking appropriate relief or can challenge the said order in the jurisdictional court.
3. Accordingly, the Anticipatory Bail Applications are disposed of.
[MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.] 9th October, 2026