[2026:RJ-JP:5294] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 5631/2019 Ker Singh Gurjar S/o. Sh. Kamal Singh Gurjar, Aged About 45 Years, R/o. Village Shahadpur, Tehsil Mahuwa, District Dausa (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Dpo Secretary, Secretariat, Rajasthan, Jaipur. 2. Rajasthan Sub Ordinate And Ministerial Service Selection Board, Rajasthan Krishi Prabhan,sansthan Parisar, Durgapura, Jaipur Through Its Secretary. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Sara Praveen For Respondent(s) : Mr. Pulkit Bhardwaj on behalf of Mr. Vigyan Shah, AAG Mr. Nalin G. Narain HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 04/02/2026 1 Considered application no. 2/2026 filed for correction in the name of cause title whereby the petitioner has requested that his father’s name has been mentioned as “Kawal Singh Gurjar” but correct name is Kamal Singh Gurjar. 2. Accordingly, the amendment is allowed, and name is corrected. Amended cause title is taken on record. 3. Application stands disposed of. 4. Considered application no. 1/2019 filed for taking documents on record. [2026:RJ-JP:5294] (2 of 2) [CW-5631/2019] 5. For the reasons stated in the application, the application is allowed and the documents are taken on record. 6. Application stands disposed of. 7. Application no.1/2026 is filed by the counsel for petitioner for disposal in light of ratio laid down in case of Bimala Kumari Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. D.B. Special Appeal (Writ) No. 152/2023 decided on 27.11.2025. 8. There is no controvert of the claim made by the counsel for petitioner and she has already supplied the copy of application to the learned counsel for respondent(s). 9. Having considered submissions and also material placed on record, the instant writ petition is disposed of in light of ratio laid down in case of Bimala Kumari Vs. State of Rajasthan (supra). 10. If the ratio of the case is applicable, the petitioner is entitled for the same benefits as has been directed by the Division Bench of this Court in case of Vimla Kumari (supra), but if the ratio is not applicable, the respondent(s) are under an obligation to decide the issue with reasoned and speaking order within 60 days from date of receipt of copy of this order. 11. Hence, the writ petition and misc. application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J CHETNA BEHRANI /37