FIROJ SHEKH ALIAS FIROJ ALI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
Cr.A(DB)/648/2026 · 2026-06-19
Arun Kumar Rai, Rongon Mukhopadhyay
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 17391 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 17391 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2026:JHHC:17891-DB 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. Appeal (DB) No. 648 of 2026
---------
1. Firoj Shekh @ Firoj Ali, aged about 51 years, son of Late Tajiruddin
2. Mokasar Hussain @ Kalu Shekh, aged about 46 years, son of Humayun Kavir
3. Bitu Shekh @ Bidu Shekh, aged about 43 years, son of Abdul Halim
4. Safikul Shekh @ Gajal Shekh, aged about 36 years, son of Manjarul Shekh
5. Aljaid Shekh @ Aljayed Sh., aged about 24 years, son of Firoj Ali
6. Jaber Shekh, aged about 40 years
7. Mithun Shekh, aged about 22 years Both sons of Rahejul Shekh All residents of village – Jhikarhati, P.O. Jhikarhati, P.S. Pakur (Muffasil), District- Pakur (Jharkhand)
... … Appellants
Versus The State of Jharkhand
... … Respondent
--------- CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR RAI
---------
For the Appellant :Mr. Rajeeva Sharma, Sr. Advocate
For the Res.-State :Mr. Pankaj Kumar P.P.
---------
02/19.06.2026 Heard Mr. Rajeeva Sharma, learned Senior Counsel for the appellants and Mr. Pankaj Kumar learned P.P. for the State. This appeal is directed against the order dated 30.04.2026 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Pakur in A.B.P. No. 164/2026 arising out of Pakur Muffasil P.S. Case No. 05 of 2026, whereby and whereunder, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the appellants has been rejected. It has been alleged that two groups were involved in pelting stones and hurling bombs with respect to a dispute regarding the construction of road. Submission has been advanced by the learned Senior Counsel for the appellants that the allegations are general and omnibus in nature. It has further been submitted that
2026:JHHC:17891-DB 2
the main allegations have been attributed to Habirul Rahman and Baidul Shekh, as they were the persons who were having a dispute with respect to the contract for construction of the road. Learned P.P. has opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail of the appellants. Regard being had to the generality of the allegations levelled against the appellants, we, while setting aside the order dated 30.04.2026 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Pakur in A.B.P. No. 164/2026, direct the appellants to surrender before the learned court below within a period of four weeks, and on their surrender, they shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.
10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned S.D.J.M., Pakur, arising out of Pakur Muffasil P.S. Case No. 05 of 2026. This appeal stands allowed. (Rongon Mukhopadhyay, J.)
(Arun Kumar Rai, J.)
Umesh-Abhishek/-