( 2026:JHHC:17835 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A. B. A. No. 1977 of 2026 Rinku Kumar @ Yogesh Kumar, aged about 50 years, son of late Laxman Prasad, resident of Station Road, Dakshin Tola, Siwan, P.O. and P.S. Siwan Nagar, District-Siwan (Bihar) ...... … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .…. … Opposite Party -------- CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI For the Petitioner :Mr. A.K. Kashyap, Sr. Advocate For the State : Mr. Fahad Allam, A.P.P. 02/ 19.06.2026: Heard learned senior counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. 2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with NDPS Case No. 02 of 2026 (arising out of Simdega P.S. Case No. 110 of 2025), registered under sections 20(b) (ii) (B) of the NDPS Act, pending in the Court of learned Additional Sessions Judge-I-cum-Special Judge, Simdega. 3. Learned senior counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case by the apprehended accused Vishal Patel and allegation is made that from Verna Car bearing Registration No. WB-02AC-9494, 62.624 kg ganja has been recovered and the said accused has wrongly stated that this petitioner has sent him to bring ganja. He submits that petitioner has got no criminal antecedent and further the petitioner has lodged the case against the co-accused. He next submits that the name of the petitioner has come in confessional statement. On these grounds, he submits that the petitioner may kindly be provided privilege of anticipatory bail. 4. Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer and submits that there are direct allegation against the petitioner that this petitioner has ( 2026:JHHC:17835 ) provided Rs. 3,00,000/- to the co-accused to bring ganja and after paying the said amount to Subhash Kumar he has taken the contraband. 5. In the F.I.R there is direct allegation against the petitioner as stated by the apprehended co-accused that this petitioner has given Rs. 3,00,000/- to bring the said contraband from one Subhash Kumar and even the quantity of contraband is 62.624 kg which is commercial. There are parameters of granting anticipatory bail in the cases arising out of N.D.P.S. Act. 6. In the attending facts and circumstances of the case, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, his prayer for anticipatory bail is hereby rejected. Dt.19.06.2026 ( Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) satyarthi-