Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010259312013 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case : I.A.(Civil)/32/2026 NIRMALENDU DAS S/O LATE SAILENDRA NATH DAS PUSHPA BIHAR LANE MEHERPUR P.O.- SILCHAR- 788015 DIST.- CACHAR ASSAM. VERSUS HINDUSTAN PAPER CORPORATION LIMITED AND ORS (REPRESENTED BY THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE) P.O. PANCHGRAM- 788802 DIST.- HAILAKANDI ASSAM. 2:THE DEPUTY GENERAL MANAGER (HR AND ES) HINDUSTAN PAPER CORPORATION LTD. CACHAR PAPER MILL P.O.- PANCHGRAM- 788802 DIST.- HAILAKANDI ASSAM. 3:THE DEPUTY GENERAL MANAGER (COMMERCIAL) HINDUSTAN PAPER CORPORATION LIMITED CACHAR PAPER MILL P.O. PANCHGRAM- 788802 DIST. HAILAKANDI ASSAM. 4:THE MANAGER (COMMERCIAL/STORE) HINDUSTAN PAPER CORPORATION LTD. CACHAR PAPER MILL Page No.# 2/3 P.O. PANCHGRAM- 788802 DIST.- HAILAKANDI ASSAM. 5:KULDEEP VERMA LIQUIDATOR OF HINDUSTAN PAPER CORPORATION LTD. 46 B.B. GANGULY STREET UNIT 501 KOLKATA- 700012 WEST BENGAL 6:UNION OF INDIA REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF INDIA MINISTRY OF HEAVY INDUSTRIES AND PUBLIC ENTERPRISE NEW DELHI - 110001 7:STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIES COMMERCE AND PUBLIC ENTERPRISES DISPUR GUWAHATI-781006 ASSAM. 8:ASSAM INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION REPRESENTED BY THE CHAIRMAN CUM MANAGING DIRECTOR OF SAID CORPORATION A-4 R.G.B. ROAD AMBIKAGIRI NAGAR GUWAHATI-781024 ASSAM. 9:CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA REPRESENTED BY THE BRANCH MANAGER PARK STREET BRANCH KOLKATA-700016 WEST BENGAL ------------ Advocate for : MR. N DHAR Advocate for : SC H P C L appearing for HINDUSTAN PAPER CORPORATION LIMITED AND ORS BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N. UNNI KRISHNAN NAIR Page No.# 3/3 ORDER Date : 09-01-2026 Heard Mr. B.K. Sen, learned counsel for the petitioners. Also heard Mr. P. Choudhury, learned counsel representing respondent No. 5. The present interlocutory application has been instituted praying for impleading opposite party No. 9, i.e. the Central Bank of India as a party respondent in the connected writ petition, i.e. W.P.(C) No. 7332/2015. I have perused the contentions made in the writ petition. This Court is of the considered view that the opposite party No. 9, i.e. the Central Bank of India is a necessary and proper party in the connected writ petition and accordingly, the petitioner is permitted to implead the opposite party No. 9 as a party respondent in the connected writ petition. With the above observations and direction, the present interlocutory application stands disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant