[2026:JHHC:18001] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 5520 of 2026 Dewakar Mandal, aged about-30 years Son of Gaya Nath Mandal, Resident of Village-Kaswa, P.O. Mangalhat, P.S. Rajmahal, District- Sahibganj. … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opp. Party Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY For the Petitioner : Mr. Gautam Kumar , Adv. For the State : Mr. Jitendra Pandey , Addl.. PP For the informant : Ms. Savita Kumari , Adv. Mr. Ramchander Sahu , Adv. 02 / 19.06.2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Rajmahal, P.S. Case No.89/2026 instituted under Section 310(2), 311 of B.N.S. 2023 and section 27 of the Arms Act. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner along with the co-accused persons committed dacoity and looted the bag of the informant in which gold jewelleries, cash of Rs.80,000/-, bank card and documents were kept by the informant. It is further submitted that the allegations against the petitioner are all false. It is next submitted that the petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. but he has not yet been put on Test Identification Parade as mentioned in para-7 of the bail application. It is then submitted that a compromise has been effected to between the petitioner and the victim and in this context, the learned counsel for the petitioner draws attention of this court to annexure-2 at page nos. 25 of the brief, which is the copy of the certified copy of the joint compromise petition field by the parties in the court of SDJM, Rajmahal. It is next submitted that the petitioner has been in jail custody since 18.05.2026, as mentioned in para 1 of this bail application. It is next submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is ready and willing to co-operate with the trial of the case and undertakes not to annoy or disturb the informant or the other witness of the case in any manner during trial of the case hence, the petitioner may be admitted to bail. Learned Addl. P.P. opposed the prayer for bail. Considering submissions of learned counsels and the facts as stated above, I am inclined to release the petitioner on bail. Hence, the court below is directed to release the petitioner on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M. Rajmahal in connection with Rajmahal, P.S. Case No.89/2026 with the condition that the petitioner will not annoy or disturb the informant or the other witness of the case in any manner during trial of the case and will co-operate with the trial of the case and will furnish mobile phone number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change the mobile phone number during the trial of the case. (ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY, J.) Dated 19.06.2026 Smita/-