Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 17385 (AP)

VIJAYA LAKSHMI MODERN RICE MILL v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/4579/2024 · 2026-03-22

Ravi Cheemalapati

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010086052024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] MONDAY,THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 4579/2024 Between: 1. VIJAYA LAKSHMI MODERN RICE MILL, Y.B. PATNAM VILLAGE, NATHAVARAM MANDAL, ANAKAPALLI DISTRICT, REP. BY ITS PROPRIETOR, KUNDRAPU APPALA NAIDU. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY. CIVIL SUPPLIES DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDING, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, 2. THE COLLECTOR CIVIL SUPPLIES, ANAKAPALLI, ANAKAPALLI DISTRICT. 3. THE DIVISIONAL ENGINEER, ANDHRA PRADESH EASTERN DISTRIBUTION COMPANY LTD, NARSIPATNAM. 4. THE ASSISTANT ENGINEER, ANDHRA PRADESH EASTERN DISTRIBUTION COMPANY LTD, NATHAVARAM. 5. BANTUPALLI VENKATESHWARA RAO, S/O CHELLAIAH, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, R/O KAKARAPALLI VILLAGE, KOTANANDURU MANDAL, KAKINADA DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court 2 may be pleased to issue a writ, order or a direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 2nd respondent in directing the 3rd and 4th respondents to disconnect the power supply of the petitioner rice mills through the Proceedings in 22.01.2024 on the ground that 6-A of EC Act, 1955 is pending against the petitioner is highly illegal, arbitrary, without power, without and to set aside the C.C.NO.36/2023/SA-5, dated jurisdiction and colourable exercise of the power same and to pass such IA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the proceedings in C.C.No.36/2023/SA-5, dated 22.01.2024 on the file of the 2nd respondent, by directing the 3rd and 4th respondents to restore the power supply to the petitioner rice mill vide Service Connection No.1157502705000268 pending disposal of the writ petition and to pass such IA NO: 2 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the Interim Order dated 22.02.2024 passed in I.A.No.1 of 2024 in W.P.No.4579 of 2024 and dismiss the writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. V V N NARAYANA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. V V SATISH (SC for APEPDCL) 2. GP FOR CIVIL SUPPLIES The Court made the following: 3 ORDER: Sri D.Prasad Kumar, learned counsel representing Sri V.V.Narayana Rao, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the cause in the writ petition does not survive and has become infructuous. Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed. _____________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI Date: 23rd March, 2026 RKS