Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 17381 (BOM)

RAKESHKUMAR SHAMBHUNATH VERMA v. KANCHANMALA RAKESHKUMAR VERMA AND ANR

WP/10691/2024 · 2026-10-09

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

60-WP-10691-2024 (C).doc N. S. Kamble IN THE JUDICATURE OF HIGH COURT AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 10691 OF 2024 Rakeshkumar Shambhunath Verma ...Petitioner Versus Kanchanmala Rakeshkumar Verma and anr. ...Respondents _________________________________________________________________ Mr.Nigam C. Kular a/w Mrs.Shilpa D. More i/b N.K. Juris, for the Petitioner. Mr.Abhijit Aher i/b Mr.Suyash Khose, for Respondent No.1. Mr.S.D. Chipade, AGP, for the Respondent-State. _________________________________________________________________ CORAM : SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J. DATE : 9th OCTOBER, 2026. P.C. : . Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner, learned counsel for Respondent No.1 and learned AGP. 2. Both learned counsel submit that, parties have settled the matter out of the Court and they have executed Consent Terms accordingly. 3. The Consent Terms is taken on record and marked ‘X’ for identification. 4. The Applicant Rakeshkumar Shambhunath Verma and Kanchanmala Rakeshkumar Verma Respondent No.1 are present in Court. Both admits the terms mentioned in the Consent Terms and signature on it. 5. Considering the submission of both learned counsel and in view of the Consent Terms, the Petition is disposed of. NILAM SANTOSH KAMBLE Digitally signed by NILAM SANTOSH KAMBLE Date: 2026.10.12 10:48:14 +0530 60-WP-10691-2024 (C).doc N. S. Kamble 6. All pending Applications are disposed of. (SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.)