[2026:RJ-JP:2758] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Contempt Petition No.260/2024 IN S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.6141/2014 Shri Krishan Bhargava S/o Sh. Sundar Lal, aged about 69 Years, R/o 85/43, Pratap Nagar, Sanganer, Jaipur. ----Petitioner Versus 1. Samit Sharma, Secretary, PHED, Govt. of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. Rakesh Luhadiya, Chief Engineer (Administration) PHED, Civil Lines, Jaipur (Rajasthan). 3. Anil Kumar Sharma, The Superintending Engineer, PHED, City Circle, South, Gandhi Nagar, Jaipur. 4. State of Rajasthan through the Chief Secretary, Govt. of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Manoj Pareek For Respondent(s) : Mr. Kuldeep Singh Rathore, AAAG with Mr. Arun Kumar, AGC on behalf of Ms. Mahi Yadav, AAG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA Order 21/01/2026 1. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that order dated 16.08.2023 has been complied with by the respondents/contemnors and the entire payment has been made to the petitioner after making due pay fixation. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner opposes such contention and stated that Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Union of India & Anr. vs. M. Siddaraj (Miscellaneous [2026:RJ-JP:2758] (2 of 2) [CCP-260/2024] Application Diary No.2400 of 2024 in Civil Appeal No.3933 of 2023) decided on 20.02.2025, has given directions that the benefits shall be given for a period of three years prior to the month in which writ petition/original application was filed by the concerned person. Such directions have not been complied with by the respondents. 3. In this regard, it is sufficient to observe that the order dated 20.02.2025 passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court is specifically clear that, in case, any person is aggrieved by non- compliance of the directions given by the Hon'ble Apex Court, then in that case, he shall be at liberty to approach the concerned authority at the first instance and if required the Administrative Tribunal/High Court as per law. 4. In view of above, no case of deliberate and wilfull disobedience is made out. Hence, the present contempt petition, is hereby, dismissed. 5. Notices stand discharged. 6. However, the petitioner shall be at liberty to approach the concerned authority/Court as per directions given by the Hon'ble Supreme Court. (ANAND SHARMA),J DAKSH/48