Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 17377 (KAR)

KUM. REKHA v. STATE OF KARNATAKA

CRL.P/1892/2019 · 2026-03-25

R Nataraj

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:16985 CRL.P No. 1892 of 2019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF MARCH, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. NATARAJ CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 1892 OF 2019 BETWEEN: KUM. REKHA D/O NAGABASAVAIAH AGED ABOUT 21 YEARS, R/AT MADDURU VILLAGE YELANDUR TALUK, CHAMARAJANAGARA DISTRICT-571 442. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. M.D.BASAVANNA, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA BY WOMEN POLICE STATION CHAMARAJANAGARA DISTRICT REP BY SPP, HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BENGALURU. 2. SHIVAMMA D/O BASAVAIAH R/AT MADDURU VILLAGE YELANDUR TALUK CHAMARAJANAGARA DISTRICT-571 442 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. MOHD. AYUB ALI, ADDL. STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR FOR RESPONDENT NO.1) THIS CRL.P IS FILED UNDER SECTION 482 OF THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 1973 PRAYING TO QUASH THE ENTIRE PROCEEDINGS PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE LEARNED CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, YELANDUR, CHAMARAJANAGARA DISTRICT IN C.C.NO.165/2017 (CRIME NO.1/2017) U/S 143, 147, 148, 341, 323, 324, 448, 504, 354 R/W 149 OF IPC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: Digitally signed by HEMALATHA J Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:16985 CRL.P No. 1892 of 2019 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. NATARAJ ORAL ORDER The petitioner has challenged the prosecution launched against them in C.C No.165/2017 arising out of Crime No.1/2017 registered by respondent No.1 for the offences punishable under Sections 143, 147, 148, 341, 323, 324, 448, 504, 354 read with Section 149 of IPC. 2. When this petition was listed for admission, this Court indicated that it is not a fit case for quashing proceedings. At that stage, the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that he would be satisfied if a direction is issued to the trial Court to dispose of C.C No.165/2017 as charges are framed in the year 2021. 3. In that view of the matter, this petition is dismissed. The trial Court is directed to expedite the trial of the case, which shall not be beyond a period of one year from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. Sd/- (R. NATARAJ) JUDGE UN/List No.: 1 Sl No.: 21