Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 17375 (RAJ)

ARJUN RAM VYAS S/O SHRI INDRA CHAND JI VYAS v. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER (FIRST), DEVASTHAN DEPARTMENT

WRES/287/2016 · 2026-01-05

Anoop Kumar Dhand

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Writ Restoration Application No. 287/2016 In S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.75/2009 Arjun Ram Vyas S/o Shri Indra Chand Ji Vyas, resident of Vyas Bhawan, Triveni Nagar, Gopalpura Byepass Road, Jaipur. ----Petitioners Versus 1. The Assistant Commissioner (First), Devasthan Department, Jaipur. 2. Parmeshwawr Nath Bohra S/o Shri Swaroop Narayan Bohra, (Died During The Pendency Of The Writ Petition) 2/1. Deweshar Nath Bohra Son Of Late Shri Parmeshwar Nath Bohra, Resident Of Bohra Ka Bagh, Purana Ghat, Guni, Jaipur. 2/2. Nandeshwar Nath Bohra Son Of Late Shri Parmeshwar Nath Bohra, (Since Deceased) Through Legal Heirs - 2/2/1. Vaibhav Sharma Son Of Late Shri Nandeshwarnath Bohra, Resident Of Bohra Ji Ka Bagh, Purana Ghat Guni, Jaipur. 2/2/2.Vibhut Sharma Son Of Late Shri Nandeshwarnath Bohra, Resident Of Bohra Ji Ka Bagh, Purana Ghat Guni, Jaipur. 2/3. Smt. Nandani Wife Of Shri Rohit, D/o Late Shri Parmeshwar Nath Bohra, Resident Of Bohra Ka Bagh, Purana Ghat, Guni, Jaipur. 2/4. Smt. Vedehi W/o Shri Ajay D/o Late Shri Parmeshwar Nath Bohra, Resident Of Bohra Ka Bagh, Purana Ghat, Guni, Jaipur. 2/5. Smt. Uttama W/o Shri Krishna Kant D/o Late Shri Parmeshwar Nath Bohra, Resident Of Bohra Ka Bagh, Purana Ghat, Guni, Jaipur. 3. The Commissioner, Devasthan Department, Rajasthan, Udaipur-Camp-Jaipur. ----Respondents (2 of 2) [WRES-287/2016] For Petitioner(s) : None present For Respondent(s) : None present JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 05/01/2026 Matter comes up on an application for restoration of S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.75/2009. Application stands allowed for the reasons stated therein. S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.75/2009 is ordered to be restored to its original number. Office is directed to proceed further in this matter. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Karan/KuD/21