Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 17375 (GAU)

JINNAT ALI AND ANR v. THE STATE OF ASSAM

Bail Appln./3847/2025 · 2026-01-04

Pranjal Das

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010262532025 2026:GAU-AS:51 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./3847/2025 JINNAT ALI AND ANR SON OF MAINUDDIN ALI VILL- ABHIPARA CHAPURI P.S. CHHAYGAON DIST. KAMRUP, ASSAM 2: ISMAIL ALI S/O RUSTAM ALI VILL- KURIHAMARI P.S. NALBARI DIST. NALBARI ASSA VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REP BY THE PP, ASSAM 2:THE STATE OF ASSAM REP BY THE PP ASSA Advocate for the Petitioner : MR F HAQUE, Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRANJAL DAS ORDER 05.01.2026 Page No.# 2/3 1. Heard Mr. F. Haque, learned counsel appearing for the accused petitioners as well as Mr. R. J. Baruah, learned Addl. P.P., Assam appearing for the State respondent. 2. This petition under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023 has been filed by the accused-petitioner, namely, Jinnat Ali and Ismail Ali praying for grant of bail in connection with PRC Case No. 518/2025 under Section 61(a) (2)/103(1)/3(5) of BNS and presently Sessions Case No. 232/2025 pending before the court of learned District and Sessions Judge, Kamrup, Amingaon. 3. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that today is fixed for framing of charge against the two accused persons who have been sent up for trial vide the charge-sheet dated 12.10.2025. The petitioners were arrested on 07.09.2025 and presently in judicial custody. 4. The prosecution case in brief is that they conspired and killed the victim, Ajahar Ali and after that his body was dumped in a river. 5. Scanned case diary has been received and I have perused the relevant portions including the statement recorded under Section 183 BNSS. I have also perused the statement of one of the accused Jinnat Ali. The investigation lends support to the allegation and implicated the petitioners. 5. Mr. R. J. Baruah, learned Additional Public Prosecutor objects to the grant of bail considering the fact that witnesses have not been examined and the nature of the allegation are quite serious. 6. Nevertheless, considering the fact that the case is poised for commencement of trial and also keeping in mind their under trial detention so far, they can be allowed to go on bail on suitable conditions. Page No.# 3/3 7. Accordingly, it is provided that the accused petitioners, named above, shall be released on bail of Rs.50,000/- each with one suitable surety of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned concerned court subject to the following conditions that the petitioners: (a) shall be available for the trial. (b) shall not hamper or tamper with the evidence (c) shall not in any manner try to intimate or influence any witness and the informant side. 8. In case of violation of any bail conditions, the prosecution or the informant side may file application for cancellation of the bail. 9. Accordingly, this bail application stands allowed and disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant