1 ( 2026:HHC:30556 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA CMPMO No.388 of 2026 Date of Decision: 23.07.2026 Sanjay Gupta …Petitioner Versus Kangra Central Cooperative Bank Ltd. & Anr. …..Respondents Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Virender Singh, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner : Ms. Vandana Thakur, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. Sohan Singh Rathore, Advocate, for respondent No.1. __________________________________________________________ Virender Singh, Judge (Oral) Notice confined to respondent No.1. Mr. Sohan Singh Rathore, learned counsel, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of respondent No.1. 2. After hearing learned counsel for the parties for a considerable time, where, it has been submitted by learned counsel appearing for the petitioner that one opportunity to file the objections, be given to JD No.2-Sanjay Gupta (petitioner), as, according to the learned counsel appearing for JD No.2 (petitioner), sufficient opportunities have not been granted to file objections. 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 ( 2026:HHC:30556 ) 3. The prayer has not been opposed, by learned counsel appearing for respondent-bank (DH). 4. Consequently, the present petition is allowed and JD No.2, is directed to file objections on or before 06.08.2026. The learned Executing Court is requested to decide those objections, within a period of four weeks, thereafter. Till then, execution of the orders dated 29.05.2026 and 19.06.2026, shall remain stayed. 5. The learned Executing Court, is at liberty to proceed further, in accordance with law, after the decision of the objections, so filed by JD No.2. 6. The present petition is accordingly disposed of, so also the pending application(s), if any, stand also disposed of. (Virender Singh) Judge July 23, 2026 (subhash)