Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 17371 (BOM)

SALONI SHUSHIL THAKUR v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

WP/3299/2017 · 2026-10-08

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 / 2 10-WP-3299-17-@-APPW-460-17.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.3299 OF 2017 Saloni Shushil Thakur .... Petitioner versus The State of Maharashtra & Anr. .... Respondents WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.460 OF 2017 IN WRIT PETITION NO.3299 OF 2017 Shweta Sushil Thakur & Anr. …. Applicants IN THE MATTER BETWEEN : Saloni Shushil Thakur .... Petitioner versus The State of Maharashtra & Anr. .... Respondents ….... • Mr. Prashant Malik, Advocate for Petitioner in WP/3299/17. • Ms. Gauri S. Rao, APP for the State/Respondent. • Senior PI, Namrata Lokhande, Special Branch 1, CID, Mumbai present. CORAM : SARANG V. KOTWAL & RANJITSINHA RAJA BHONSALE, JJ. DATE : 08th OCTOBER, 2026 P.C. : 1. Learned APP states that she and officer Senior PI, Namrata Lokhande has interacted with the Petitioner and they Nesarikar MANUSHREE NESARIKAR Digitally signed by MANUSHREE NESARIKAR Date: 2026.10.12 11:34:56 +0530 2 / 2 10-WP-3299-17-@-APPW-460-17.odt are satisfied that her prayer for withdrawal of the Petition is genuine. 2. In this view of the matter, the Petition is permitted to be withdrawn and is disposed of as withdrawn. 3. The connected application is also disposed of. (RANJITSINHA RAJA BHONSALE, J.) (SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.)