[2026:RJ-JP:4951] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 284/2025 1. Bheem Sain Gautam S/o Late Shri Madan Lal Gautam, Aged About 60 Years, R/o Village Sarola, Sultanpur, Kota (Raj.) 2. Bheem Sain Gautam, Aged About 60 Years, 180, Rhc, Jaipur ----Petitioners Versus 1. Mahendra Khdgawat (Mr.), Principal Secretary, Department Of Education, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.) 2. Ashish Modi (Mr.), Director Secondary Education, Government Of Rajasthan, Bikaner 3. Tej Kumar (Mr.), Joint Director (School Education), Kota Division, Kota 4. K.k. Sharma (Mr.), Chief District Education Officer, Kota (Raj.) 5. Arjun Jagriwal (Mr.), Block Education Officer, Sultanpur, Kota (Raj.) 6. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Department Of Education, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Prem Shankar Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manoj Sharma, AAG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR Order 03/02/2026 It is informed by learned counsel for the respondent that pursuant to the order dated 16.01.2025, no recovery was effected from the petitioner and order has been passed, directing the [2026:RJ-JP:4951] (2 of 2) [CCP-284/2025] concerned authorities to not to recover the amount vide annexure-2. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that substantial compliance of the impugned order dated 16.01.2025 has not been made. The respondent has not released the pension and monetary benefits available to the petitioner, therefore, the respondents may be directed to release the amount. Heard and perused the material available on record. In the impugned order dated 16.01.2025, while granting the interim relief to the petitioner, it was directed that recovery shall not be made in pursuant to the orders dated 06.07.2024 and 23.07.2024 and there was no order to the effect that petitioner shall be given all the pensionary benefits available to him. Therefore, considering the aforesaid facts, no further action is required in the present contempt petition. The rule is discharged. Accordingly, the civil contempt petition is disposed of. (PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J Keshav/19