Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 17364 (RAJ)

DURGA PRASAD v. STATE OF RAJ AND ORS

CW/4352/2003 · 2026-01-22

Anand Sharma

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:2879] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 4352/2003 Durga Prasad son of Shri Chandmal Lohar, aged about 41 years, resident of Sarafa Tehsil and District Ajmer. ----Petitioner Versus 1. Secretary, Government of Rajasthan, Public Health Engineering Department, Government Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. Additional Chief Engineer, Public Health Engineering Department, Area Ajmer Jal Bhawan Shanti Nagar, Ajmer (Rajasthan) 3. Superintendent Engineer, Public Health Engineering Department, Production and Distribution Division, Ajmer, Tap Godown, Ajmer (Rajasthan) 4. Assistant Engineer, Public Health Engineering Department, Distribution Sub-Division I, Ajmer (Rajasthan) ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Govind Gupta for Mr. M.F. Baig For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA Order 22/01/2026 1. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner with a limited prayer to direct the respondents for considering candidature of the petitioner for assigning semi permanent status and permanent status on completing two and ten years of service respectively under the Rajasthan Work-charged Employees Service Rules, 1964. 2. Reply to the writ petition was filed by the respondents in which although, an objection with regard to there being no [2026:RJ-JP:2879] (2 of 2) [CW-4352/2003] sanctioned post was taken, yet a letter dated 23.08.2003 issued by Executing Engineer to the learned counsel for the petitioner has been enclosed in which, it has been informed that for the purpose of grant of semi permanent status/permanent status, guidelines of higher authorities have been sought. 3. The respondents as they contended in their reply are not in a position to intimate with regard to final outcome of such consideration, if any, made by the respondents. 4. Under these circumstances, this writ petition is disposed of with the directions to the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner under the Rajasthan Work-charged Employees Service Rules, 1964 for assigning semi permanent status/permanent status after completing two/ten years of service as the case may be, if such consideration has not yet been made and in case, petitioner is found eligible and entitled under the Rules, benefits after assigning semi permanent status/permanet status be also given to the petitioner. 5. Necessary exercise shall be carried out within a period of 60 days from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. 6. Writ petition stands disposed of accordingly. (ANAND SHARMA),J DIVYA /6