1 2026:HHC:30600 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA COPC No.900 of 2026 Date of Decision: 24.07.2026 ___________________________________________________ Deodar Heritage House ....Petitioner Versus Rajesh Agrawal and Ors. …Respondents ___________________________________________________ Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja, Judge Whether approved for reporting?1 ________________________________________________ For the petitioner : Mr. Amrit, Advocate, vice Mr. Sanjeev Sood, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Balram Sharma, Deputy Solicitor General of India, with Mr. Rajiv Sharma, Advocate for respondents No.1 & 2. Mr. Manoj Chauhan, Additional Advocate General, for respondents No.3 & 4. ________________________________________________ Sushil Kukreja, Judge (Oral) Learned Deputy Solicitor General of India has placed on record copy of minutes of the 22nd Empowered Committee Meeting held on 25.06.2026, wherein it has been stated as under:- 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 2026:HHC:30600 “28.4. In view of the above, the Committee noted that, as the mandatory eligibility requirements stipulated under Clause 7.3 of the Scheme Notification, as reproduced in Part C of these Minutes, is not being fulfilled, the unit, prima facie, is not found eligible. Moreover, in the absence of any budgetary allocation under the Scheme, the application cannot be granted registration.” 2. Therefore, in this view of the matter, no further orders are required to be passed in the present contempt petition and, accordingly, the same is closed and disposed of. Notice discharged. 3. However, liberty is reserved to the petitioner to avail appropriate remedy, as available to it under the law. The petition is disposed of, so also pending application(s), if any. ( Sushil Kukreja ) July 24, 2026 Judge (Kiran)