IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.17684 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-83 Year-2024 Thana- NAYAGAON District- Begusarai ====================================================== Sintu Kumar @ Pankaj Yadav @ Panda Yadav, S/o Indradev Yadav (Wrongly written as Nandan Yadav in Impugned order) Resident of Village - Dariyapur, P.S - Nayagoan, District - Begusarai ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ravindra Kumar, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Parmanand Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 2 01-06-2026 Heard learned Advocate for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. 2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Nayagaon P.S. Case No.83 of 2024 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 126(2), 115(2), 352, 351(2), 109, 117(2) and 303(2) of the BNS. 3. On the alleged date and time of occurrence, all the FIR named accused persons, including the petitioner, armed with iron rod, lathi, and danda, brutally assaulted the informant and one Krishna Kumar, due to which they sustained serious injuries. The accused persons also tied the hands and legs of the informant, and the petitioner snatched the valuables before he was thrown into the water. Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.17684 of 2026(2) dt.01-06-2026 2/3 4. Learned Advocate for the petitioner, taking this Court through the FIR, submitted that omnibus nature of allegations has been levelled against eleven named accused persons. So far as the petitioner is concerned, it is only alleged that he snatched the valuables, which appears to be concocted. It is further submitted that there is a case and counter-case, and prior to the institution of the present case, co-accused Nandan Yadav instituted Nayagaon P.S. Case No. 82 of 2024 against the informant and his persons. The persons of the petitioner’s side have also sustained grievous injuries. Moreover, the petitioner bears fair antecedent, and other co-accused persons against whom there is allegation of assault have been extended the privilege of anticipatory bail by a co-ordinate Bench of this Court in Criminal Miscellaneous Nos. 38784 of 2025 and 39570 of 2025. 5. On the other hand, learned Advocate for the State vehemently opposed the bail application and submitted that there is a specific accusation against the petitioner of snatching the valuables, besides participation in the crime. 6. Having considered the omnibus nature of allegation as also the factum of case and counter-case, coupled with the fact that the case of the petitioner is based on parity, inasmuch Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.17684 of 2026(2) dt.01-06-2026 3/3 as other co-accused persons have been allowed the privilege of anticipatory bail, as also the fair antecedent of the petitioner, let the above named petitioner, be released on bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of four weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Begusarai in connection with Nayagaon P.S. Case No.83 of 2024, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 482(2) of the BNSS, with further condition that one of the bailors shall be the own/close family members of the petitioner. rohit/- (Harish Kumar, J) U T