Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 17356 (GAU)

SAIDUL ISLAM v. THE STATE OF ASSAM

Bail Appln./4011/2025 · 2026-01-07

Pranjal Das

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010274992025 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./4011/2025 SAIDUL ISLAM S/O NOTUL SHEIKH R/O - VILL - JAMLAI, P.S - NAGARBERA, DIST - KAMRUP, ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY P.P ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. A PARAMANIK, P. KALITA Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRANJAL DAS ORDER 08.01.2026 1. Heard Mr. A. Paramanik, learned counsel appearing for the accused petitioner. Also heard Mr. R. J. Baruah, learned Addl. P.P., Assam appearing for the State respondent. 2. This petition under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023 has been filed by the Page No.# 2/3 accused-petitioner, namely, Saidul Islam seeking bail in connection with Bongaigaon PS Case No. 292/2025 under Section 305(a)/317(2) of BNS Act. 3. The accused was in custody since 17.11.2025. 4. The FIR was lodged on behalf of GB construction. The gist of the allegation was that one Bolero vehicle was carrying materials given by one Manash Pratim Dowarah but subsequently, it was missing and thereafter, it was recovered. Suspicion has been cast in the FIR regarding the said driver, as being involved in theft of the vehicle and along with the materials in association with other people. 5. The present petitioner is not named in the FIR and learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he is an ordinary employee of the firm and not connected with the alleged offence. 6. Case diary has been received. 6. Learned prosecution fairly submits that main allegations are against another person. 7. Considering that aspect of the matter and also considering the length of detention, I am of the view that bail may be granted to the petitioner. 8. Accordingly, it is provided that the accused petitioner, named above, shall be released on bail of Rs.25,000/- with one suitable surety of like amount to the satisfaction of learned concerned court subject to the following conditions that the petitioners: (a) shall co-operate with the remaining investigation. (b) shall not hamper or tamper with the evidence 9. Accordingly, this bail application stands allowed and disposed of. Page No.# 3/3 10. Return the case diary. JUDGE Comparing Assistant