[2026:RJ-JP:911] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 5303/2022 Divyanshu Choudhary S/o Shyam Choudhary, Aged About 22 Years, R/o Sikar Global Residential School, Village Mau, District Sikar, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Department Of Agriculture, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 2. The Director, Department Of Agriculture, Shreeji Nagar, Choti Chopad, Prithviraj Colony, Durgapura, Jaipur, Rajasthan - 302018 3. The Secretary, Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, State Institute Of Agriculture Management Premises, Durgapura, Jaipur, Rajasthan 302018 ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Akshit Gupta For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manish Bhardwaj for Mr. Nalin G. Narain HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 09/01/2026 1. Instant writ petition is preferred by petitioner with following prayer: “In these circumstances, it is, therefore, prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to accept this writ petition and i) the impugned final result dated 07.03.2022 and impugned verbal rejection of respondent authorities of not according appointment to humble petitioner on the post of Agriculture Supervisor may kindly be [2026:RJ-JP:911] (2 of 3) [CW-5303/2022] declared illegal and arbitrary and therefore, same may kindly be quashed and set aside; ii) By issuing appropriate writ or direction in the nature thereof the respondents may kindly be directed to: (a) Treat the candidate of humble petitioner eligible for the post of Agriculture Supervisor in OBC Outstanding Sportperson category pursuant to advertisement dated 05.02.2021; and (b) Accord appointment to humble petitioner in OBC Outstanding Sportperson category with all consequential benefits on the post of Agriculture Supervisor pursuant to advertisement dated 05.02.2021. 2. Learned counsel for petitioner while referring and relying upon judgment dated 15.12.2025 in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 234/2025 titled as Sumitra Runla and Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan and Anr. submits that the controversy and the issue raised herein is already settled by this Hon’ble Court. He further submitted that instant writ petition be disposed of in accordance with aforesaid order. 3. Having considered the submissions of learned counsel for petitioner and also material placed on record, the writ petition may be disposed in light of Sumitra Runla and Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan and Anr. (supra). 4. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioner is given a liberty to submit a representation to the respondents- Authority within a period of 30 days raising all grounds and the respondents-Authority are directed to decide the representation in light of ratio laid down in case of Sumitra Runla and Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan and Anr. (supra), but in case of deviation [2026:RJ-JP:911] (3 of 3) [CW-5303/2022] with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of representation. After the decision, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the order to the petitioner either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioner has provided E-mail in his representation. If the petitioner is still aggrieved, he has a liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition. 5. Needless to say that if ratio is applicable upon facts of the case as claimed by the petitioner, then same benefits be extended. 6. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J GAURAV /48