Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 17355 (JHR)

DILIP PRASAD GUPTA @ DILIP KUMAR GUPTA v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

A.B.A./3153/2026 · 2026-06-18

Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:17799 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 3153 of 2026 ------ Dilip Prasad Gupta @ Dilip Kumar Gupta, S/o Vishawanath Prasad Gupta, R/o Village- Parsodih, PO- Parsodih, and PS- Ketar, District- Garhwa. . .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI For the Petitioner : Mr. Abhay Kr. Chaturvedy, Advocate For the State : Mr. Ajay Kr. Pathak, A.P.P. ------ 02/18.06.2026. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. 2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Ketar P.S. Case No.80 of 2024, registered for the offence under Sections 191 (2), 191 (3), 192(3), 190, 126 (2), 115 (2) and 109 of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and the case is pending in the court of learned J. M. 1st Class (Nagar Untari), Garhwa. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that altercation took place due to land dispute and that allegation is there against 14 accused persons on coming on the field while the informant was harvesting the crop. 4. He next submits that injury is there. However, it is not clear that pursuant to whose assault, the injury has been received by the informant. Further the petitioner has no criminal antecedent as disclosed in Para-13 of the instant petition. 5. Learned counsel appearing for the State has opposed the prayer and submits that allegation of assault is there against all the accused persons including the petitioner. 6. On perusal of the FIR, it transpires that the allegation is there against 14 accused persons assembling on the plot where the informant was harvesting the crop. Further there is general and omnibus allegation against the accused persons. It is not clear from perusal of the FIR that pursuant to whose assault, the injury has been received by the informant and further, the petitioner has no criminal antecedent as disclosed in Para-13 of the instant petition, I am inclined to enlarge the petitioner on anticipatory bail. 2026:JHHC:17799 2 7. Accordingly, the above-named petitioner is directed to surrender before the learned Court within two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order before the learned Trial Court and in the event of his arrest or surrender, he shall be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned J. M. 1st Class (Nagar Untari), Garhwa, in connection with Ketar P.S. Case No.80 of 2024, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. (Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Sandeep/ Uploaded/