Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 17353 (GAU)

MOJIBUR RAHMAN v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR

AB/2758/2025 · 2026-01-07

Pranjal Das

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010257862025 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : AB/2758/2025 MOJIBUR RAHMAN S/O LATE SEKANDAR ALI VILL- TENGAGURI KACHARUGAON, P.O- TENGAGURI, P.S-LAHARIGHAT DIST-MORIGAON, ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR REP. BY THE PP, ASSAM 2:PARBIN SULTANA W/O MOHSIN AHMED VILL- TENGAGURI KACHARIGAON P.O. TENGAGURI P.S. LAHARIGHAT DIST. MORIGAON ASSAM PIN-78212 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR M H AHMED, MR N ZAMAN Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, H G DAISY (R-2) BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRANJAL DAS ORDER 08.01.2026 1. Heard Mr. M. H. Ahmed, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. D. P. Goswami, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State Page No.# 2/3 and Ms. H. G. Daisy, learned counsel for the informant. 2. This petition filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, the petitioner, namely, Mojibur Rahman, has prayed for granting pre-arrest bail, apprehending arrest in connection with PRC Case No. 1037/2020, registered under Section 457/376/323/511 of IPC pending in the court of JMFC, Morigaon. 3. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor opposed granting of bail. 4. Learned counsel for the informant submits that the case is at the stage of appearance at present and order regarding bail may be passed as per law. 5. I have perused the annexed document and orders of the learned court below. The case is pending for appearance and committal. It is pointed out by the prosecution that due to the absence of the petitioner in between the case got delayed. In this context learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner shall co-operate with the trial. 6. In these circumstances to facilitate the progress of trial, I allow this petition. 7. Accordingly, it is provided that in the event of arrest of the petitioners, named above, in connection with above mentioned case, they shall be released on furnishing bail bond of Rs.50,000/- with a suitable surety of the like amount, to the satisfaction of the arresting authority. The direction for pre-arrest bail is subject to the conditions that the petitioners: (a) Shall not abscond and appear before the learned court Page No.# 3/3 below. (b) Shall not hamper or tamper with the evidence of the case. 8. Accordingly, this anticipatory bail application stands allowed and disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant