[2026:RJ-JP:536] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 9072/2007 Smt Rameshwari Devi W/o Late Shri Prahlad Singh Meena, aged about 65 years, resident of Village & Post Mehrawar, Tehsil Kumhar, District Bharatpur (Rajasthan) ----Petitioner Versus 1. State of Rajasthan through Secretary, Department of School Education, Rajasthan Secretariate Jaipur. 2. Director, Deptt. Of School Education, Jaipur 3. Distt. Education Officer Primary School Education Bharatpur ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. R. A. Katta, Adv. Mr. M. K. Dhakad, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manik Kaswan, Adv. Mr. S. M. Sharma, Adv. for Mr. Manoj Sharma, Adv. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA Order 08/01/2026 1. Petitioner has filed the instant writ petition with the following prayers:- “It is, therefore, most respectfully prayed that the Hon'ble High Court may be pleased to admit this writ petition and call for the record and by an appropriate writ, order or direction - (i) The impugned verbal denial be quashed and set-grant the benefit of upgradation of grade to the petitioners from 22.12.75/1.9.79 with consequential benefits in second and first grade in accordance with the order of the revision and fixation in subsequent pay scales from time to time from that dates, their similar and junior persons have been granted the benefit: [2026:RJ-JP:536] (2 of 3) [CW-9072/2007] (ii) the respondents be directed to pay the arrears from 22.12.75 / 1.9.79 or from the date of grant of Grade IInd / Ist to their junior persons/Similarly situated persons as discussed above with the permissible rate of interest or at the Bank rate : (iii) the respondents be directed to keep the seniority list unchanged in accordance with the notification dated 14.10.76 or the petitioners be given the proper placement in the seniority list accordingly. (iv) grant the benefit of revised pension and other retiral benefits including provident fund gratuity etc. to the retired petitioners in accordance with the benefit accrued in their favour treating them in service with consequential benefits including the interest upon arrear : (v) Any other relief, which is deemed just and proper may also be granted in favour of the petitioners : (vi) the cost of the writ petition may also be awarded in favour of the petitioners.” 2. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the controversy in the instant case has already been decided by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide judgment dated 18.11.2017 passed in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.18106/2012 (Balram Verma Vs. Union of India & Ors.). 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that the petitioner may be granted liberty to make a representation in the light of the judgment dated 18.11.2017 passed in the case of Balram Verma (Supra). 4. In the light of limited prayer made by the petitioner, the instant writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to make a representation before the Competent Authority, which shall be considered by the respondents strictly in accordance with law and in case, the petitioner succeeds in establishing her rights, [2026:RJ-JP:536] (3 of 3) [CW-9072/2007] due benefits be given to her. In the event of filing any representation by the petitioner within a period of 15 days, the same shall be decided within a period of 3 months thereafter. 5. The Civil Writ Petition stands disposed of. (ANAND SHARMA),J Jatin /02