1 2026:CGHC:8772 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCC No. 130 of 2026 1 - Durgesh Nandani Gupta Wd/o Late Vijay Kumar Gupta Aged About 34 Years R/o Village Imlibhata, Bandhwapara, Police Station Sarkanda, District Bilaspur (C.G.) 2 - Harsh @ Chintu S/o Late Vijay Kumar Gupta Aged About 16 Years Minors, Through Their Natural Guardian Mother I.E. The Appellant No. 1 R/o Village Imlibhata, Bandhwapara, Police Station Sarkanda, District Bilaspur (C.G.) 3 - Karan Gupta S/o Late Vijay Kumar Gupta Aged About 14 Years Minors, Through Their Natural Guardian Mother I.E. The Appellant No. 1 R/o Village Imlibhata, Bandhwapara, Police Station Sarkanda, District Bilaspur (C.G.) 4 - Ramkumar Gupta (Presently Died) S/o Late Jivrakhan Lal Gupta, R/o Village Imlibhata, Bandhwapara, Police Station Sarkanda, District Bilaspur (C.G.) 5 - Sandhya Devi W/o Late Ramkumar Gupta Aged About 72 Years R/o Village Imlibhata, Bandhwapara, Police Station Sarkanda, District Bilaspur (C.G.) ... Petitioners. Versus 1 - Vitthal Yadav S/o Shri Santosh Yadav Aged About 27 Years R/o Bandhwapara, Sarkanda, District Bilaspur (C.G.) (Driver Of Bus No. Cg-11-Zb- 0471) 2 - Abhilash Manikpuri S/o Sri Suresh Manikpuri R/o Village Sukulkari, Tahsil Masturi, District Bilaspur (Owner Of Bus No. Cg-11-Zb-0471) 3 - National Insurance Com. Ltd. Through The Divisional Manager Vyapar Vihar Road, Bilaspur (C.G.) (Insurer Of Bus No. Cg-11-Zb-0471) ... Respondents. (cause title downloaded from CIS Periphery) Digitally signed by AJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI DN: cn=AJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI, ou=HIGH COURT, o=HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, st=Chhattisgarh, c=IN Date: 2026.02.19 17:16:03 +0530 2 For Petitioners : Mr. Pravesh Sahu, Advocate. For Res No.3 : Mr. Dashrath Prajapti, Advocate. (Hon’ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi ) Order on Board 19/02/2026 1. Heard on IA No.1 – Application for condonation of delay. 2. Counsel for respondent does not oppose the prayer for condonation of delay. 3. Considering the reasons assigned in the application and considering the short period of delay 25 days, IA No.1 is allowed. Delay in filing the MCC is condoned. 4. Heard on application for restoration of MAC No.20/2017 (Durgesh Nandani Gupta and Ors Vs. Vitthal Yadav and Ors) which was dismissed for want of prosecution on 23.09.2025 by this Court. 5. Counsel for the respondent does not oppose the aforesaid application. 6. Taking into consideration the submission of learned counsel for the applicant and the reasons assigned in the application, I am inclined to allow the instant MCC. 7. Accordingly, the MCC is allowed. MAC No.20/2017 be restored to its original number. Sd/- (Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi) Judge Ajay